Skip to content

feat: add rhel8 and rhel9 to guest os list #1473

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MindTooth
Copy link

@MindTooth MindTooth commented Apr 24, 2025

What this PR does / why we need it:

Today we only see vsphere-vm.cpu-4.mem-16gb.os-unknown as guest OS name:


Screenshot 2025-04-24 at 13 42 07

Taken from this list: https://knowledge.broadcom.com/external/article/321876/determine-the-guest-os-from-a-vm-configu.html

Note! RHEL 9 needs compatibility profile 18 or higher.

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

N/A

Special notes for your reviewer:

I also see that setting the type string is only done at discovery. IMHO, it should have been reconciled because you might scale the nodes via vSphere.

instanceType := fmt.Sprintf("vsphere-vm.cpu-%d.mem-%dgb.os-%s",

Release note:

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 24, 2025

CLA Signed


The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @MindTooth!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/cloud-provider-vsphere 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/cloud-provider-vsphere has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @MindTooth. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MindTooth
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign lubronzhan for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from dougm and YanzhaoLi April 24, 2025 11:47
@MindTooth MindTooth changed the title feat: add more rhel8 and rhel9 to guestos list feat: add rhel8 and rhel9 to guestos list Apr 24, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 24, 2025
@MindTooth MindTooth changed the title feat: add rhel8 and rhel9 to guestos list feat: add rhel8 and rhel9 to guest os list Apr 24, 2025
@MindTooth MindTooth force-pushed the feat/add_more_guestos branch from aa32d1b to 36f10a1 Compare April 24, 2025 11:47
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 24, 2025
@zhanggbj
Copy link
Collaborator

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Apr 28, 2025
@MindTooth
Copy link
Author

Do you think it will be okay to add rhel10_64Guest also, now that RHEL 10 officially announced? I see that it's added to vSphere yet by VMware, but could be a future proofing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants