Skip to content

Conversation

twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor

Finish re-work from PR review for #4516.

Proposed Changes

  • set token issues interface method to package scope
  • set token issues constructor functions to package scope
  • inline test name variables in token issuer tests
  • remove unused test case struct members
  • remove unused if conditions

Finish re-work from PR review:
- set token issues interface method to package scope
- set token issues constructor functions to package scope
- inline test name variables in token issuer tests
- remove unused test case struct members

Signed-off-by: Stanislav Jakuschevskij <[email protected]>
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added area/control-plane size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 8, 2025
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested review from creydr and matzew October 8, 2025 08:44
@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @creydr

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 30.10%. Comparing base (150a9bd) to head (94b34ac).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...lane/pkg/security/oauth/msk_access_token_issuer.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...pkg/security/oauth/msk_role_access_token_issuer.go 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
control-plane/pkg/security/oauth/token_provider.go 66.66% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #4553   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   30.10%   30.10%           
=======================================
  Files         294      294           
  Lines       19543    19543           
=======================================
  Hits         5883     5883           
  Misses      13207    13207           
  Partials      453      453           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@creydr creydr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Thanks for the cleanup

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 8, 2025
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Oct 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: creydr, twoGiants

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 8, 2025
@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@dprotaso
Copy link
Contributor

dprotaso commented Oct 8, 2025

known flake - #4519

/retest

@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test reconciler-tests

2 similar comments
@creydr
Copy link
Contributor

creydr commented Oct 9, 2025

/test reconciler-tests

@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test reconciler-tests

@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test upgrade-tests

2 similar comments
@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test upgrade-tests

@twoGiants
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test upgrade-tests

Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Oct 14, 2025

@twoGiants: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
upgrade-tests_eventing-kafka-broker_main 94b34ac link true /test upgrade-tests

Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/control-plane lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants