-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
WIP: Remove *(Diagonal, Woodbury) #19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.38% 70.40% -1.98%
==========================================
Files 4 4
Lines 105 98 -7
==========================================
- Hits 76 69 -7
Misses 29 29
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just not sure why we need the constructor for?
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ function WoodburyPDMat( | |||
return WoodburyPDMat(A, Diagonal(D), Diagonal(S)) | |||
end | |||
|
|||
WoodburyPDMat{T, TA, TD, TS}(vals...) where {T, TA, TD, TS} = WoodburyPDMat(vals...) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we need this constructor?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, we don't for this MR. Mistake adding this from experimenting with ChainRules. I'll just leave it in though
Closes #18