[SYCL] XFAIL ext_intel_cslice.cpp on DG2 #19811
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Hu, Peisen <[email protected]>
igchor
approved these changes
Aug 15, 2025
|
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers Hi can you please merge this? Thank you! |
aelovikov-intel
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2025
This test is currently failing on Windows DG2 machines. Same reasoning as #19811: as mentioned in #18576, the root cause here is that DG2 never supported ZEX_NUMBER_OF_CCS. Therefore, XFAIL-ing this test on all DG2 machines (previously it is only XFAIL-ed on Linux DG2 machines). Signed-off-by: Hu, Peisen <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This test is currently failing on Windows DG2 machines. The minimal reproducer is: minimal_reproducer.cpp
It turns out that removing "ZEX_NUMBER_OF_CCS=0:4" from the minimal reproducer makes it pass. This matches the comments in #18576 : the root cause here is that DG2 never supported
ZEX_NUMBER_OF_CCS. Therefore, XFAIL-ing this test on all DG2 machines (previously it is only XFAIL-ed on Linux DG2 machines).