Skip to content

Conversation

@AnnaKravchenko
Copy link
Contributor

@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko commented Nov 24, 2025

HADDCOK3 tutorial page is neatly organized (thank you @VGPReys!), while HADDOCK2.4 is still just a list of tutorials.

I took https://bioexcel.eu/services/training/ as a reference and categorised HADDOCK2.4 tutorials into bacis, intermediate and advanced levels, with protein-protein highlghted as a “getting started” one. On top of it, I categorised tutorials as “web”, “command line” and “mix of both”, and added Documentation section.

I would like a feedback on this way of splitting level-category and web/linux-category. Would it perhaps be better to add sebsections “Web sever” and “Command line” to a single “Intermediate” category?

At some point heared about some source of information about the parameters of the web server, a video, a tutorial or a web page with explanation? Does it really exist, or is it just a false memory of mine?

@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko marked this pull request as draft November 24, 2025 16:24
@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko self-assigned this Nov 24, 2025
@AnnaKravchenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

I would like to discuss this PR in person, at the same time as a discussion of User Surveys analysis.

Copy link
Member

@amjjbonvin amjjbonvin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense.

We should revisit the local installation tutorial as it is most likely no longer up to date for haddock2.5

@AnnaKravchenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Makes sense.

We should revisit the local installation tutorial as it is most likely no longer up to date for haddock2.5

We should consider a separation of HADDOCK web server from HADDOCK2.5 command line tool on the tutorials/documentation level.

Now the tutorials are for web server - except the local installation one; but HADDOCK2.4 manual is for command line tool. Likely extremely confusing for the new users.

@amjjbonvin
Copy link
Member

amjjbonvin commented Nov 25, 2025 via email

@AnnaKravchenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

We don’t have a manual for the web server…

Unfortunately:(
Still, I think a clearer separation between command-line-related materials and web server related materials might make it easier for our users.

@amjjbonvin
Copy link
Member

Which is why I approved it ... so simply merge it

@rvhonorato
Copy link
Member

We don’t have a manual for the web server…

Unfortunately:( Still, I think a clearer separation between command-line-related materials and web server related materials might make it easier for our users.

I think so too - maybe would be better to keep here only the one for command-line tools, for web based things it makes more sense for their guides to be hosted together with the tools. So it would also be easier to keep them up-to-date

@amjjbonvin
Copy link
Member

amjjbonvin commented Nov 25, 2025 via email

@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2025 13:25
@AnnaKravchenko
Copy link
Contributor Author

Previous version had typos and mixed up "a complementary use of command line togther with haddock web” with haddock commad line.

@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko merged commit d9aae80 into master Nov 25, 2025
2 checks passed
@AnnaKravchenko AnnaKravchenko deleted the order-h24-tuto branch November 25, 2025 13:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants