Skip to content

Update PR data Daily collection (2025-04-02 00:47 UTC) #62

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 2, 2025

Conversation

gounthar
Copy link
Owner

@gounthar gounthar commented Apr 2, 2025

This PR contains automatically updated PR statistics data. Generated by GitHub Actions.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated automated check run details by revising execution timestamps and job URLs to reflect the latest build activity. These changes ensure that the status information aligns with current job executions and maintains up-to-date reporting across the system.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates several JSON files by revising the timestamps and URLs associated with various check run entries. The changes adjust the completedAt and startedAt fields from dates in March 2025 to new dates in April 2025. Additionally, URL fields such as detailsUrl (and in one file, targetUrl) are updated to reference the latest job runs. The overall JSON structures remain intact with no modifications to any exported or public entities.

Changes

Files Change Summary
data/consolidated/all_prs.json, data/consolidated/open_prs.json Updated startedAt and completedAt timestamps and revised detailsUrl (and in open_prs.json, the StatusContext's targetUrl) to reflect new build runs in April 2025.
data/consolidated/failing_prs.json Modified statusCheckRollup by updating startedAt and completedAt timestamps and changing targetUrl and detailsUrl (from job run 4 to 5) for Jenkins CI checks.

Possibly related PRs

Poem

In fields of JSON where dates now gleam,
I hopped to update each timestamp's dream.
From March’s past to April’s brand new light,
URLs and checks now dance in bright delight.
A little rabbit cheers each change so neat—
Code and carrots in harmony, oh so sweet!


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @gounthar, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This PR updates the PR statistics data automatically using GitHub Actions. It updates the all_prs.json, failing_prs.json, and open_prs.json files with the latest data, including check run statuses, details URLs, and timestamps. The data reflects changes in the Jenkins CI and security scans for various pull requests.

Highlights

  • Data Update: The PR updates the PR statistics data in all_prs.json, failing_prs.json, and open_prs.json.
  • Check Run Statuses: It updates the check run statuses, including completion times, conclusions, and details URLs for various Jenkins CI jobs and security scans.
  • Failing PRs: The PR reflects updated status for failing PRs, specifically updating the details for a Proxmox plugin PR.

Changelog

Click here to see the changelog
  • data/consolidated/all_prs.json
    • Updated check run statuses and details URLs for PR-130 of the m2release-plugin, reflecting the latest Jenkins CI results and security scans.
    • Timestamps for check runs have been updated to '2025-04-01' from '2025-03-05'.
  • data/consolidated/failing_prs.json
    • Updated status context and check run details for a Proxmox plugin PR, including updated timestamps and target URLs.
    • Timestamps for the failing Proxmox plugin PR have been updated to '2025-04-01' from '2025-03-29'.
  • data/consolidated/open_prs.json
    • Updated check run statuses and details URLs for PR-130 of the m2release-plugin, mirroring the changes in all_prs.json.
    • Updated status context and check run details for a Proxmox plugin PR, mirroring the changes in failing_prs.json.
    • Timestamps for check runs have been updated to '2025-04-01' from '2025-03-05' for the m2release-plugin PR.
    • Timestamps for the failing Proxmox plugin PR have been updated to '2025-04-01' from '2025-03-29'.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A daily data dance,
PR stats in a JSON trance,
Actions automate,
Keeping data straight,
For insights, a helpful glance.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR updates the PR statistics data. The changes involve updating timestamps and URLs in JSON files. Overall, the changes seem straightforward, but I have a few observations.

Summary of Findings

  • Data Consistency: The PR updates timestamps and URLs. It's important to ensure that these updates are consistent across all relevant files (all_prs.json, failing_prs.json, open_prs.json) to avoid discrepancies in the data.
  • Error Handling in Scripts: The collect-monthly.sh script contains error handling, but it's crucial to ensure that all potential failure points are covered, especially when dealing with external commands like jq and go run.

Merge Readiness

The PR seems to be a routine update of data. However, it's important to ensure data consistency across all files. I am unable to approve this pull request, and recommend that others review and approve this code before merging. Given the nature of the changes, I recommend that the data consistency be verified before merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
data/consolidated/open_prs.json (1)

4129-4297: Consistent Updates for CheckRun Entries and Potential URL Typo

The updates in this hunk correctly refresh the ISO 8601 timestamps (completedAt and startedAt) and job-run URLs (detailsUrl) for multiple CheckRun objects. The new dates from April 2025 are consistent and appear correctly formatted. However, note that the URL on line 4164 contains a double slash (//coverage), which might be a typographical error that could lead to URL resolution issues.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1efc811 and 02d1fb8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • data/consolidated/all_prs.json (2 hunks)
  • data/consolidated/failing_prs.json (1 hunks)
  • data/consolidated/open_prs.json (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
data/consolidated/all_prs.json (2)

6751-6920: Verify Automated Timestamp and URL Updates in CheckRun Entries

The updated JSON entries in this hunk show new ISO 8601 formatted values for the "completedAt" and "startedAt" fields as well as revised "detailsUrl" fields for the check runs. These changes appear to correctly update the Jenkins job run endpoints and timestamps to April 2025 as specified in the PR objectives. Please confirm that these automated updates reflect the intended build data from GitHub Actions and that no manual adjustments are needed.


10944-10960: Confirm Status Context and Failure Details

In this hunk, the "StatusContext" object now reports a "state" of "ERROR" with an updated "targetUrl," while the associated "CheckRun" entry reflects a "FAILURE" conclusion. Ensure that these status updates—indicating an error in the PR build process—are intentional and accurately represent the latest tooling outputs. It might be useful to double-check that this differentiation between "ERROR" and "FAILURE" is handled consistently in any further reporting or alerting mechanisms.

data/consolidated/failing_prs.json (2)

961-964: Update: Revised "StatusContext" Timestamp and URL

The "startedAt" field is now set to "2025-04-01T10:40:19Z" and the "targetUrl" has been updated to point to the new PR build URL. These changes should accurately reflect the latest CI run for the failing PR. Please verify these values against the Jenkins job logs to ensure consistency.


967-971: Update: Revised "CheckRun" Completion Timestamp, Details URL, and Start Time

The "completedAt" timestamp has been updated to "2025-04-01T10:40:18Z", the "detailsUrl" now reflects the new build attempt URL, and the "startedAt" in this check run is updated to "2025-04-01T10:38:40Z". These modifications align the CheckRun data with the updated build information for the PR. Please ensure these adjustments correctly match your intended CI pipeline revisions.

data/consolidated/open_prs.json (1)

7641-7657: Accurate Status and Timestamp Updates in Second Hunk

This hunk updates a StatusContext and a CheckRun entry for a different plugin (proxmox-plugin). The new timestamps, states, and URLs are formatted correctly with ISO 8601 strings. The StatusContext object now shows a "state": "ERROR", while the corresponding CheckRun has "conclusion": "FAILURE". Please verify that these values are intentionally set to reflect the failing job run and that the URLs are correct.

@gounthar gounthar merged commit 16867ce into main Apr 2, 2025
2 checks passed
@gounthar gounthar deleted the auto-update-pr-data branch April 2, 2025 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant