Skip to content

Conversation

gordonmessmer
Copy link
Member

Adds the --skip-check option proposed in issue #162

@hroncok
Copy link
Member

hroncok commented Sep 16, 2019

I am not very fond of this change. It promotes bad habits. If we cannot run %check, it shall be bconded out, not removed.

@gordonmessmer
Copy link
Member Author

So that I'm clear, you're suggesting that --skip-check should add a bcond, right? Or do you mean that we shouldn't add the --skip-check option at all?

Assuming the former, should the bcond default to not running the checks? That is, do we assume that the checks are being skipped because they won't work in mock by default (because they need network access, for example?)

@hroncok
Copy link
Member

hroncok commented Sep 16, 2019

Either not adding this at all, or it should add a bcond, disabled by default.

evgeni pushed a commit to evgeni/pyp2rpm that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants