Skip to content

DRAFT: IEP-1559 Add SWT Tests to Verify Syntax Highlighting Functionality #1255

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sigmaaa
Copy link
Collaborator

@sigmaaa sigmaaa commented Jun 18, 2025

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed.

Fixes # (IEP-XXX)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How has this been tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • Test A
  • Test B

Test Configuration:

  • ESP-IDF Version:
  • OS (Windows,Linux and macOS):

Dependent components impacted by this PR:

  • Component 1
  • Component 2

Checklist

  • PR Self Reviewed
  • Applied Code formatting
  • Added Documentation
  • Added Unit Test
  • Verified on all platforms - Windows,Linux and macOS

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new automated test to verify that opening the main.c file in a new Espressif IDF project does not produce any errors in the Eclipse Error Log view.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 18, 2025

Walkthrough

A new UI test was added to the Espressif IDF project test suite. This test creates a project, opens the main source file, and checks the Eclipse Error Log for exceptions. Supporting logic was implemented in a new static method within an inner class to encapsulate the UI interactions required for the test.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
tests/com.espressif.idf.ui.test/src/.../NewEspressifIDFProjectTest.java Added a test method to check for absence of exceptions in the Error Log after opening main.c; added supporting static method in Fixture inner class.

Suggested reviewers

  • AndriiFilippov
  • kolipakakondal
  • alirana01

Poem

A project is born, the main file in view,
The error log checked—no exceptions break through!
With paws on the keyboard and whiskers held high,
The rabbit ensures that no errors slip by.
🐇✨

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5ab1129 and 69d812b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/com.espressif.idf.ui.test/src/com/espressif/idf/ui/test/executable/cases/project/NewEspressifIDFProjectTest.java (3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: precommit
  • GitHub Check: build_macos

Comment on lines +184 to +191
@Test
public void givenMainCFileOpenedThenNoErrorsShouldBeInErrorLog() throws Exception
{
Fixture.givenNewEspressifIDFProjectIsSelected("EspressIf", "Espressif IDF Project");
Fixture.givenProjectNameIs("ErrorLogTestProject");
Fixture.whenNewProjectIsSelected();
Fixture.openMainCAndCheckIfNoExceptionInErrorLog();
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Potential flakiness – Error Log may contain residual entries from previous tests

givenMainCFileOpenedThenNoErrorsShouldBeInErrorLog assumes that the Eclipse Error Log starts empty, yet none of the test-fixture methods clear the log first.
If an earlier test has left warnings or exceptions in the log (even if unrelated), this test will fail non-deterministically, making the suite flaky.

Add a step to clear the Error Log before performing the assertion, or clear it in Fixture.cleanTestEnv().
Example (inside the new helper method before the assertion):

errorLogView.toolbarButton("Clear Log").click();
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
tests/com.espressif.idf.ui.test/src/com/espressif/idf/ui/test/executable/cases/project/NewEspressifIDFProjectTest.java
around lines 184 to 191, the test
givenMainCFileOpenedThenNoErrorsShouldBeInErrorLog assumes the Eclipse Error Log
is empty but does not clear it before checking, causing potential flakiness. Fix
this by adding a step to clear the Error Log before the assertion, either by
invoking errorLogView.toolbarButton("Clear Log").click() before opening the main
C file or by clearing the log in Fixture.cleanTestEnv() to ensure a clean state
for the test.

Comment on lines +437 to +445
try
{
SWTBotTable errorTable = errorLogView.bot().table();
// Check if there are no exceptions in error log
boolean hasErrors = errorTable.containsItem("Exception");

assertTrue(!hasErrors);
}
catch (WidgetNotFoundException e)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Assertion can miss errors and lacks clarity

SWTBotTable.containsItem("Exception") only matches if any cell equals “Exception”.
Actual log rows usually contain class names or messages ("java.lang.Exception", "Unhandled event loop exception", …) and will not be caught.

Replace the check with a scan of all rows for the substring “Exception” (or simply assert that the table has zero rows), and use assertFalse for readability:

- boolean hasErrors = errorTable.containsItem("Exception");
- assertTrue(!hasErrors);
+ boolean hasErrors = Arrays.stream(errorTable.getItems())
+                           .anyMatch(item -> item.getText().contains("Exception"));
+ assertFalse("Unexpected entries containing 'Exception' found in the Error Log", hasErrors);

You will need to add

import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;

to the import section.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
tests/com.espressif.idf.ui.test/src/com/espressif/idf/ui/test/executable/cases/project/NewEspressifIDFProjectTest.java
around lines 437 to 445, the current assertion uses
SWTBotTable.containsItem("Exception") which only matches exact cell content and
can miss error messages containing "Exception" as a substring. Replace this with
code that scans all rows for the substring "Exception" or simply assert that the
error table has zero rows to ensure no errors are present. Also, change the
assertion to assertFalse for better readability and add the import statement
'import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;' to the imports section.

Comment on lines +427 to +435
// Open the "Error Log" view
bot.menu("Window").menu("Show View").menu("Other...").click();

// Type and open "Error Log"
SWTBotShell showViewShell = bot.shell("Show View");
showViewShell.activate();
bot.tree().expandNode("General").select("Error Log");
bot.button("Open").click();
SWTBotView errorLogView = bot.activeView();
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Menu navigation is brittle across Eclipse versions

Opening Window ▸ Show View ▸ Other… and then drilling down to “General → Error Log” relies on the view being nested exactly there.
On recent Eclipse releases the Error Log is often available directly under Show View (without Other…) or lives in a different category.

Recommend falling back to direct access first and only opening the Other… dialog if the direct menu item is absent:

- bot.menu("Window").menu("Show View").menu("Other...").click();
+ SWTBotMenu showView = bot.menu("Window").menu("Show View");
+ if (showView.menu("Error Log", false) != null) { // false → do not fail if missing
+     showView.menu("Error Log").click();
+ } else {
+     showView.menu("Other...").click();
+     // … existing code to open via dialog
+ }

This removes a common source of WidgetNotFoundException on different IDE versions.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// Open the "Error Log" view
bot.menu("Window").menu("Show View").menu("Other...").click();
// Type and open "Error Log"
SWTBotShell showViewShell = bot.shell("Show View");
showViewShell.activate();
bot.tree().expandNode("General").select("Error Log");
bot.button("Open").click();
SWTBotView errorLogView = bot.activeView();
// Open the "Error Log" view
SWTBotMenu showView = bot.menu("Window").menu("Show View");
if (showView.menu("Error Log", false) != null) {
showView.menu("Error Log").click();
} else {
showView.menu("Other...").click();
// … existing code to open via dialog
}
// Type and open "Error Log"
SWTBotShell showViewShell = bot.shell("Show View");
showViewShell.activate();
bot.tree().expandNode("General").select("Error Log");
bot.button("Open").click();
SWTBotView errorLogView = bot.activeView();
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In
tests/com.espressif.idf.ui.test/src/com/espressif/idf/ui/test/executable/cases/project/NewEspressifIDFProjectTest.java
around lines 427 to 435, the current code opens the "Error Log" view by
navigating through "Window ▸ Show View ▸ Other…" and then selecting "General →
Error Log," which is brittle across Eclipse versions. To fix this, first attempt
to open the "Error Log" view directly from the "Show View" menu if available; if
not found, then fall back to opening the "Other…" dialog and selecting "Error
Log" from there. This approach avoids WidgetNotFoundException by adapting to
different menu structures in various Eclipse versions.

Copy link
Collaborator

@alirana01 alirana01 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
Its good that we are not using any example projects since they may have some dependency that is missing on test env. Do you think we can improve it to have some predefined main.c file that can reference some internal files specifically I think FreeRTOS area because they are the ones that can give most errors

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants