feat:make stone-related fields mandatory in Jewellery Receipt based on 'has_stone' property #431
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…n 'has_stone' property
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Feature description
make stone-related fields mandatory in Jewellery Receipt based on 'has_stone' property
Solution description
This update ensures that stone-related fields (stone, stone_uom, stone_weight, and rate) in the Jewellery Receipt form become mandatory when the has_stone checkbox is checked for a row in the Jewellery Item Receipt child table.
Output screenshots (optional)
Post the output screenshots, if a UI is affected or added due to this feature.
Areas affected and ensured
Jewellery Receipt
Is there any existing behavior change of other features due to this code change?
Mention Yes or No. If Yes, provide the appropriate explanation.
Was this feature tested on the browsers?