Add VyOS #88
Merged
Add VyOS #88
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
felbinger
force-pushed
the
nf/outbound-announce-own-vyos
branch
2 times, most recently
from
9f9d61f to
bd9367a
Compare
The VyOS configuration tree is just a wrapper for FRR, so if not implemented in FRR it's not implement in VyOS
felbinger
force-pushed
the
nf/outbound-announce-own-vyos
branch
from
d61b537 to
4b5795c
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The configuration of bgp changed from 1.3 (
protocols bgp <ASN> ...) to 1.4 (protocols bgp ..., with asystem-asproperty).The configuration options for prefix-lists / route-maps haven't been changed since VyOS 1.1, so I added tabs with just policies as generic "VyOS".
As I mentioned in the chat, I believe route_filtering/inbound/default_route might be incorrect for FRR because it includes two match statements within the same route-map sequence. Both conditions would need to be met simultaneously, which isn’t possible, because
0.0.0.0/0 != ::/0.For now, I’ve adopted it as it is in the guide. I might need to revise this file later if we confirm that the FRR configuration is incorrect.