Skip to content

Conversation

@dcermak
Copy link
Owner

@dcermak dcermak commented Aug 21, 2024

This fixes #149

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 21, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.50%. Comparing base (92c1a63) to head (aebac9d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #221      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   94.96%   95.50%   +0.53%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines        1113     1179      +66     
  Branches      231      253      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits         1057     1126      +69     
+ Misses         42       39       -3     
  Partials       14       14              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@dcermak dcermak force-pushed the multistage branch 9 times, most recently from bdeb383 to 9cf6e5d Compare August 26, 2024 14:54
@dcermak dcermak force-pushed the multistage branch 2 times, most recently from f3378bf to aebac9d Compare August 27, 2024 12:46
Copy link
Collaborator

@grisu48 grisu48 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bigger PR, but so far it makes sense. LGTM.

via ``--network=host``.

The :py:meth:`~pytest_container.container.ContainerBaseABC.prepare_container`
The :py:meth:`~pytest_container.container._ContainerPrepareABC.prepare_container`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since _ContainerPrepareABC is just an abstract internal class, I wonder if it makes much sense to mention it in a usage document, but I guess this is more of a style question.

for name, ctr in self.containers.items():
if isinstance(ctr, str):
warnings.warn(
UserWarning(
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Neat warning and code block, me likes!

grisu48
grisu48 previously approved these changes Sep 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Drop MultiStageBuild

4 participants