Skip to content

Conversation

@ahastudio
Copy link
Member

@ahastudio ahastudio commented Apr 7, 2025

티켓 또는 댓글 생성에 성공했을 때 HTTP Response Status Code를 200 OK가 아니라 201 Created로 응답하도록 수정.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • 티켓 생성 및 댓글 작성 기능에서, 작업 완료 후 성공 여부를 보다 명확하게 확인할 수 있도록 응답 메시지가 개선되었습니다.

티켓, 댓글 생성에 성공했을 때 HTTP Response Status Code를 200이 아니라
201 Created로 응답하도록 변경.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 7, 2025

Walkthrough

이 PR은 tickets/openapi.yaml 파일 내의 두 엔드포인트에 대해 HTTP 응답 상태 코드를 "200"에서 "201"으로 변경합니다. "POST /tickets"와 "POST /tickets/{ticketId}/comments" 엔드포인트 모두 성공적으로 생성되었음을 표시하기 위해 상태 코드를 업데이트하며, 각 응답에 한글 설명("티켓 생성 성공", "댓글 생성 성공")을 포함합니다.

Changes

파일 변경 내용
tickets/openapi.yaml "POST /tickets"와 "POST /tickets/{ticketId}/comments" 엔드포인트의 응답 상태 코드를 200 → 201 변경

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant A as API Server

    C->>A: POST /tickets
    A-->>C: 201 Created
Loading
sequenceDiagram
    participant C as Client
    participant A as API Server

    C->>A: POST /tickets/{ticketId}/comments
    A-->>C: 201 Created
Loading

Possibly related PRs

Poem

귀여운 토끼가 뛰어놀며,
코드 정리하는 기쁨 노래해요.
200에서 201로,
요청마다 새 생명을 불어넣네.
🐇✨ 행운과 코드가 함께하길!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c7d5332 and d59857e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tickets/openapi.yaml (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tickets/openapi.yaml (2)

72-86: 티켓 생성 엔드포인트의 HTTP 응답 코드 변경 확인
변경된 응답 코드 "201"와 "티켓 생성 성공" 설명은 자원 생성에 적합한 HTTP 표준을 따르고 있어 적절합니다. 예제 응답 내용도 올바르며, 본 PR의 목적에 부합합니다.


259-270: 댓글 생성 엔드포인트의 HTTP 응답 코드 변경 확인
댓글 생성 시 "201" 코드와 "댓글 생성 성공" 메시지로 응답하는 변경 사항은 RESTful API 설계 원칙에 부합합니다. 응답 본문의 예제도 적절하게 구성되었습니다.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @ahastudio, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request updates the HTTP response status code for successful ticket and comment creation from 200 OK to 201 Created. This change aligns the API's behavior with HTTP standards, where 201 Created indicates that a resource has been successfully created.

Highlights

  • HTTP Status Code Update: The response code for successful ticket creation is changed from 200 to 201.
  • HTTP Status Code Update: The response code for successful comment creation is changed from 200 to 201.

Changelog

  • tickets/openapi.yaml
    • Updated the response code for successful ticket creation from '200' to '201' on line 72.
    • Updated the response code for successful comment creation from '200' to '201' on line 259.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A two-oh-one,
A resource is spun,
Success in the code.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

The pull request modifies the HTTP response status code for successful ticket and comment creation from 200 OK to 201 Created. This is a good change as it aligns with HTTP standards for resource creation.

Merge Readiness

The code changes are straightforward and address the issue described in the pull request. I recommend merging this pull request after addressing the comments. I am unable to directly approve the pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

@ahastudio ahastudio requested a review from Copilot April 7, 2025 07:31
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot wasn't able to review any files in this pull request.

Files not reviewed (1)
  • tickets/openapi.yaml: Language not supported

@ahastudio ahastudio merged commit d58db49 into dal-lab:main Apr 7, 2025
2 checks passed
@ahastudio ahastudio deleted the 201-created branch April 7, 2025 07:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant