Skip to content

feat: set capabilities for next edit #7029

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025
Merged

feat: set capabilities for next edit #7029

merged 16 commits into from
Aug 7, 2025

Conversation

jpoly1219
Copy link
Collaborator

@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 commented Aug 6, 2025

Description

Closes CON-3283.

Users can now set next_edit as a per-model capability.

Checklist

  • I've read the contributing guide
  • The relevant docs, if any, have been updated or created
  • The relevant tests, if any, have been updated or created

Screen recording or screenshot

[ When applicable, please include a short screen recording or screenshot - this makes it much easier for us as contributors to review and understand your changes. See this PR as a good example. ]

Tests

core/llm/autodetect.vitest.ts


Summary by cubic

Added support for setting the next_edit capability per model, allowing only specific models to use the next edit feature.

  • New Features
    • Models can now declare next_edit capability in their config.
    • Logic checks this capability before enabling next edit in the app and VS Code extension.
    • Added tests to verify correct detection of supported models.

@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 requested a review from a team as a code owner August 6, 2025 23:02
@jpoly1219 jpoly1219 requested review from tingwai and removed request for a team August 6, 2025 23:02
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 6, 2025
tingwai
tingwai previously requested changes Aug 7, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@tingwai tingwai left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, just some quick changes

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to In Progress in Issues and PRs Aug 7, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@RomneyDa RomneyDa left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@tingwai doing prerelease, looks like @jpoly1219 made requested changes, stamping!

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Aug 7, 2025
@RomneyDa RomneyDa dismissed tingwai’s stale review August 7, 2025 02:04

requested changes were made.

@RomneyDa RomneyDa merged commit e1d39bb into main Aug 7, 2025
38 checks passed
@RomneyDa RomneyDa deleted the jacob/con-3283 branch August 7, 2025 02:04
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Done in Issues and PRs Aug 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 7, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the tier 2 Important feature that adds new capabilities to the platform or improves critical user journeys label Aug 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tier 2 Important feature that adds new capabilities to the platform or improves critical user journeys
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants