This document outlines the security policies, procedures, and best practices for the BlocksenseOS project. BlocksenseOS is a confidential computing platform that requires the highest levels of security throughout its development, deployment, and operation.
- Multiple layers of security controls
- Redundant security measures
- Fail-safe defaults
- Verify all components and communications
- Assume breach scenarios
- Least privilege access
- Comprehensive dependency scanning
- Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) generation
- Signed builds and artifacts
- Deterministic builds
- Auditable processes
- Transparent security practices
-
Static Analysis: All code undergoes automated static analysis using:
- Rust:
cargo clippy
,cargo audit
,cargo deny
- C++:
clang-static-analyzer
,cppcheck
- Nix:
alejandra --check
- Rust:
-
Dynamic Testing: Runtime security testing including:
- Memory safety validation
- Input fuzzing
- Property-based testing with
proptest
-
Security Reviews: Manual security code reviews for:
- Cryptographic implementations
- TEE integration points
- Network communication protocols
- Input validation logic
-
Dependency Management:
- Only allow dependencies from trusted registries
- Pin all dependencies to specific versions
- Regular vulnerability scanning with
cargo audit
- License compliance checking with
cargo deny
-
SBOM Generation:
- Automated generation using
syft
andcyclonedx-bom
- Include all direct and transitive dependencies
- Generate multiple formats (SPDX, CycloneDX)
- Automated generation using
-
Reproducible Builds:
- Nix-based deterministic builds
- Content-addressed derivations
- Build attestation generation
-
Signed Artifacts:
- All release artifacts are cryptographically signed
- Build provenance tracking
- Verification instructions provided
-
Attestation Validation:
- Comprehensive TEE report verification
- Support for SEV-SNP, TDX, and SGX
- Certificate chain validation
- TCB status verification
-
Cryptographic Security:
- Hardware-backed key generation
- Secure random number generation
- Constant-time cryptographic operations
- Regular key rotation
-
Input Validation:
- Strict input sanitization
- Size limits enforcement
- UTF-8 validation
- Null byte detection
-
Rate Limiting:
- Per-client request limits
- Configurable time windows
- DDoS protection
-
Connection Security:
- Timeout enforcement
- Connection limits
- Graceful degradation
-
Data at Rest:
- Full disk encryption with LUKS
- TPM-sealed encryption keys
- Secure key derivation
-
Data in Transit:
- TLS for all network communications
- Certificate validation
- Perfect forward secrecy
-
Data in Use:
- TEE memory protection
- Secure enclaves for processing
- Memory clearing after use
-
Automated Scanning:
- Daily vulnerability scans with
trivy
- Container and filesystem scanning
- Configuration security scanning
- Daily vulnerability scans with
-
Dependency Monitoring:
- Continuous monitoring of dependencies
- Automated alerts for new vulnerabilities
- Regular dependency updates
- Detection: Automated and manual vulnerability detection
- Assessment: Risk analysis and impact evaluation
- Response: Coordinated patching and mitigation
- Communication: Stakeholder notification
- Post-Incident: Review and process improvement
- Critical Vulnerabilities: Patched within 24 hours
- High Severity: Patched within 7 days
- Medium/Low Severity: Patched in next release cycle
- Unit Tests: Security-focused unit tests for all components
- Integration Tests: End-to-end security validation
- Property-Based Tests: Fuzzing and property verification
- Performance Tests: Security under load conditions
- Penetration Testing: Regular third-party security assessments
- Code Reviews: Manual security code reviews
- Architecture Reviews: Security design validation
- Internal Audits: Monthly security reviews
- External Audits: Annual third-party security audits
- Continuous Monitoring: Real-time security monitoring
- Security Policies: This document and related policies
- Procedures: Detailed security procedures
- Training: Security awareness and training materials
- Threat modeling
- Security requirements definition
- Risk assessment
- Secure coding practices
- Code reviews
- Static analysis
- Security testing
- Penetration testing
- Vulnerability scanning
- Secure configuration
- Access controls
- Monitoring setup
- Security updates
- Monitoring and alerting
- Incident response
- Rust Security:
cargo audit
,cargo deny
,cargo clippy
- Vulnerability Scanning:
trivy
,syft
,cyclonedx-bom
- Static Analysis: Language-specific analyzers
- Build Security: Nix, reproducible builds
- Automated Checks: Security validation in all pipelines
- Artifact Signing: All builds are signed
- SBOM Generation: Automated SBOM creation
- Vulnerability Gates: Block deployments with critical vulnerabilities
- Critical: Immediate security threat, potential data breach
- High: Significant security vulnerability
- Medium: Security issue with limited impact
- Low: Minor security concern
- Critical: Response within 1 hour, resolution within 24 hours
- High: Response within 4 hours, resolution within 7 days
- Medium: Response within 24 hours, resolution within 30 days
- Low: Response within 7 days, resolution in next release
- Internal: Security team, development team, management
- External: Users, customers, security community (as appropriate)
- Public: Security advisories, CVE submissions
- Security Lead: [[email protected]]
- Security Engineers: [[email protected]]
- Email: [[email protected]]
- PGP Key: [Public key for encrypted communications]
- Bug Bounty: [Link to responsible disclosure program]
- ISO 27001: Information security management
- SOC 2: Security, availability, and confidentiality
- Common Criteria: Security evaluation standards
- GDPR: Data protection compliance
- SOX: Financial reporting controls
- Industry Standards: Relevant industry security standards
- Secure Coding: All developers
- Security Awareness: All team members
- Incident Response: Security and operations teams
- Documentation: Security policies and procedures
- Training Materials: Online courses and workshops
- Security Champions: Team security advocates
- Vulnerability Resolution Time: Average time to patch vulnerabilities
- Security Test Coverage: Percentage of code with security tests
- Incident Response Time: Time to respond to security incidents
- Audit Findings: Number and severity of audit findings
- Training Completion: Percentage of required training completed
- Policy Compliance: Adherence to security policies
- Vulnerability assessment results
- Security metrics review
- Incident analysis
- Security policy updates
- Tool effectiveness assessment
- Training program evaluation
- Comprehensive security assessment
- External audit results
- Security strategy planning
Version | Date | Changes |
---|---|---|
1.0 | 2025-06-12 | Initial security policy |
Document Classification: Public
Last Updated: June 12, 2025
Next Review: September 12, 2025