feat: Add outputFunctionName config property #331
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jessepav
changed the title
jessepav
force-pushed
the
output-function
branch
2 times, most recently
from
502bc08 to
8a40757
Compare
|
@jessepav looks good! Could you change it to be all on one line to reduce generated template size? function ${config.outputFunctionName}(s){__eta.res+=s;} |
jessepav
force-pushed
the
output-function
branch
from
8a40757 to
cb4c420
Compare
|
All set – output function is now on one line. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add an
outputFunctionNameconfig property, which defaults tooutput, that behaves like EJS'soutputFunctionName.Closes #284