Skip to content

swap to use CRT implementation of STS Web Identity Provider #3505

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbiscigl
Copy link
Contributor

@sbiscigl sbiscigl commented Aug 1, 2025

Description of changes:

We currently have a handwritten client for calling AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity in our credentials provider chain. We are moving this refer the the common runtime implementation.

Check all that applies:

  • Did a review by yourself.
  • Added proper tests to cover this PR. (If tests are not applicable, explain.)
  • Checked if this PR is a breaking (APIs have been changed) change.
  • Checked if this PR will not introduce cross-platform inconsistent behavior.
  • Checked if this PR would require a ReadMe/Wiki update.

Check which platforms you have built SDK on to verify the correctness of this PR.

  • Linux
  • Windows
  • Android
  • MacOS
  • IOS
  • Other Platforms

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@sbiscigl sbiscigl force-pushed the crt-web-identity-provider branch 8 times, most recently from c1db394 to d0bb48d Compare August 4, 2025 14:08
@sbiscigl sbiscigl force-pushed the crt-web-identity-provider branch 2 times, most recently from 0fb2d1a to a4e70c4 Compare August 4, 2025 21:24
@sbiscigl sbiscigl force-pushed the crt-web-identity-provider branch 5 times, most recently from f751fb9 to 3f19342 Compare August 6, 2025 17:09
@sbiscigl sbiscigl force-pushed the crt-web-identity-provider branch from 3f19342 to 1658eef Compare August 6, 2025 19:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants