Skip to content

Containerization: Always set TERM #146

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

dcantah
Copy link
Member

@dcantah dcantah commented Jun 17, 2025

Make sure we always set TERM for containers that ask for a tty. Right now this handling was spread around in a bunch of spots, but I'd wager setting it for the client on the host via LinuxContainer/Process is more sane and already what we do for a lot of the other fields.

@dcantah dcantah requested a review from crosbymichael June 17, 2025 10:21
Make sure we always set TERM=xterm for containers that ask for a tty.
@dcantah dcantah merged commit 2a96a0d into apple:main Jun 19, 2025
2 checks passed
adityaramani pushed a commit to adityaramani/containerization that referenced this pull request Jun 20, 2025
Make sure we always set TERM for containers that ask for a tty. Right
now this handling was spread around in a bunch of spots, but I'd wager
setting it for the client on the host via LinuxContainer/Process is more
sane and already what we do for a lot of the other fields.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants