feat: Partition predicate fix for Databricks runtime support #14059
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ad1happy2go
force-pushed
the
databricks_partition_predicate_fix
branch
from
2dcbc47 to
43b5324
Compare
ad1happy2go
changed the title
nsivabalan
reviewed
Oct 8, 2025
Yes @nsivabalan I have tested this and reads are working fine in databricks also now. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Describe the issue this Pull Request addresses
Fixes #14058
While running hudi on databricks, the code failed as InterpretedPredicate was expecting two parameters in the constructor
Summary and Changelog
We can use Hudi with Databricks Runtime seemlessly. Before we were facing issues while adding partition predicate to hudi reads with Databricks runtime
Impact
none
Risk Level
none
Documentation Update
Contributor's checklist