Skip to content

Conversation

@mannycarrera4
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

Fixes: #3538

Release Category

Components


Checklist

For the Reviewer

  • PR title is short and descriptive
  • PR summary describes the change (Fixes/Resolves linked correctly)
  • PR Release Notes describes additional information useful to call out in a release message or removed if not applicable
  • Breaking Changes provides useful information to upgrade to this code or removed if not applicable

Where Should the Reviewer Start?

Areas for Feedback? (optional)

  • Code
  • Documentation
  • Testing
  • Codemods

Testing Manually

Screenshots or GIFs (if applicable)

Thank You Gif (optional)

@cypress
Copy link

cypress bot commented Oct 14, 2025

Workday/canvas-kit    Run #9693

Run Properties:  status check passed Passed #9693  •  git commit fe2416b403 ℹ️: Merge 282fbddc8d892b6a4f509b5937385f1c5b0809bc into 855523604579f224308dcf7e7413...
Project Workday/canvas-kit
Branch Review mc-input-fallback
Run status status check passed Passed #9693
Run duration 02m 24s
Commit git commit fe2416b403 ℹ️: Merge 282fbddc8d892b6a4f509b5937385f1c5b0809bc into 855523604579f224308dcf7e7413...
Committer Manuel Carrera
View all properties for this run ↗︎

Test results
Tests that failed  Failures 0
Tests that were flaky  Flaky 1
Tests that did not run due to a developer annotating a test with .skip  Pending 86
Tests that did not run due to a failure in a mocha hook  Skipped 0
Tests that passed  Passing 843
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎
UI Coverage  19.34%
  Untested elements 1533  
  Tested elements 365  
Accessibility  99.31%
  Failed rules  6 critical   5 serious   0 moderate   2 minor
  Failed elements 77  

@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 marked this pull request as ready for review October 22, 2025 19:07
@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 added the ready for review Code is ready for review label Oct 22, 2025
@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 self-assigned this Oct 22, 2025
@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 moved this to 🏗 In progress in Canvas Kit Oct 27, 2025
@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Canvas Kit Oct 27, 2025
Copy link
Member

@alanbsmith alanbsmith left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I left a question, but it's non-blocking, so this is good to go. Thanks, Manny.

system: {
shape: {
//TODO: in v4 Tokens and v15, we should replace this forward fit token with the actual token value
sm: '--cnvs-sys-shape-sm', // this should be set to 8px
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a non-blocking question, and more of a design decision I'm trying to understand.

Why did you choose to do it like the above instead of like this below?

sm: cssVar(forwardFitTokens.system.shape.sm, system.shape.x1Half),

I don't have a preference, but I was wondering if you do.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ahh I can do that, i think in my head i can see the style property and then know that it is forward fitted, no preference

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That would make sense too. I don't think there's a right or wrong here. The way I wrote it above prevents someone from accidentally putting a different default value for the token.

@mannycarrera4 mannycarrera4 added automerge and removed ready for review Code is ready for review labels Oct 27, 2025
@alanbsmith alanbsmith merged commit 1369db6 into Workday:master Oct 27, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 👀 In review to ✅ Done in Canvas Kit Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

Status: ✅ Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Create fallback for input border radius CSS token

2 participants