Skip to content

fix: Ensure proper closing of li element in plugin-editor.php #8937

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

debabratakarfa
Copy link

This commit ensures that the list item element in the plugin file tree navigation is closed adequately with a tag. The HTML structure in plugin-editor.php now correctly nests the tree structure with proper opening and closing tags.

This improves HTML validity and accessibility compliance for screen readers and other assistive technologies that rely on proper DOM structure, especially important for elements using ARIA roles like "treeitem" and "group".

Trac ticket: https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/63546

Props dkarfa

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2025

The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the props-bot label.

Core Committers: Use this line as a base for the props when committing in SVN:

Props dkarfa.

To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Test using WordPress Playground

The changes in this pull request can previewed and tested using a WordPress Playground instance.

WordPress Playground is an experimental project that creates a full WordPress instance entirely within the browser.

Some things to be aware of

  • The Plugin and Theme Directories cannot be accessed within Playground.
  • All changes will be lost when closing a tab with a Playground instance.
  • All changes will be lost when refreshing the page.
  • A fresh instance is created each time the link below is clicked.
  • Every time this pull request is updated, a new ZIP file containing all changes is created. If changes are not reflected in the Playground instance,
    it's possible that the most recent build failed, or has not completed. Check the list of workflow runs to be sure.

For more details about these limitations and more, check out the Limitations page in the WordPress Playground documentation.

Test this pull request with WordPress Playground.

@@ -288,6 +288,7 @@
<ul role="group">
<?php wp_print_plugin_file_tree( wp_make_plugin_file_tree( $plugin_editable_files ) ); ?>
</ul>
</li>
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While it makes sense to add this, it won't actually impact the structure of parsed HTML in the DOM. The parsing rules of HTML allow for implicitly-closed LI tags.

Compare the parsed DOM trees:

The only difference is an extra whitespace #text node.

See MDN reference:

Tag omission: The end tag can be omitted if the list item is immediately followed by another <li> element, or if there is no more content in its parent element.

Copy link
Contributor

@joedolson joedolson Jun 9, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. Also has no real world accessibility consequences, and doesn't violate WCAG as of version 2.2, when the relevant criteria was removed.

However, while no reputable accessibility company would consider it an issue, it is technically required under laws stipulating conformance with WCAG 2.0 or 2.1.

Still worth fixing. We just need to recognize that it's minor.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noted. Thank you, @westonruter & @joedolson, for your feedback.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants