-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
Fix procedure invocation request timeout #53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gernest
wants to merge
33
commits into
VoltDB:master
Choose a base branch
from
gernest:timeout
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The struct was not necessary, it only wraps procedureInvocation without adding any new functionality. It is much better just working with procedureInvocation directy
remove unencessary drain channels
- move response processing to one goroutine - rework draining code
* master: Update voltkv benchmark
- fix request cancelation - apply timeouts to @statistics,@SystemCatalog queries - add the wuery string to the timeout error mesage
Open
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The code that is currently handling timeouts doesn't reflect what request timeout means, and less optimal. As a result, it makes it hard to reason about properly shutting down a node connection without affecting other parts of the client in async mode.
here is the code
voltdb-client-go/voltdbclient/node_conn.go
Lines 349 to 359 in 181ff2b
See, the problem here, first in async, it is guaranteed that the requests object will be huge, because the rate of the requests will far exceed the rate of responses from voltdb. Meaning at every interval, we will be iterating over a thousand of stored requests just to manual checkout if they have timeout. This might seem to work fine with sync/sql mode because the request/response ratio is small so the operation is fast enough.
I am considering a solution where the procedure invocation will be tracking its own timeout. Which means, every request will accurately track its timeout.
By
timeoutI mean the time between the request being sent to voltdb and receiving a response for the particular request exceeds the duration assigned to the request through theConn.*Timeoutapi calls.Why is this important?
I have tried many ways to research on properly handling dead nodes when in async. And this inconsistency in handling timeouts has been disrupting all options. One of the cases is, lots of requests will be gone through the client, we want the procedure invocation request to cleanup all the resources attached to it with-ought affecting the rest of the requests tracked by the connection when we mark the node connection as closed(dead)