-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
Fixes for v0.9.7 #193
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixes for v0.9.7 #193
Conversation
Don't consider failed alias execution as a critical reason to exit hubot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Uh oh
I get the idea of releasing an isolated fix to the user, but let's please avoid detached/split releases like that in future.
Instead we should try to release more frequently from master.
|
Don't forget to apply respective Github labels for better Issues organization. |
|
Also after merging this, how do you plan to sync-up changes back to the current master? |
I was following SemVer:
AIUI, this is the same approach we take in st2, where we have feature and bugfix releases.
I don't quite understand how that would help this situation, can you explain a bit more?
I don't. The PR #192 is the same fix for |
|
It may look similar, however both git history and results are different. For the st2 repo we maintain the versioned "stable" branches, which is not the case for repositories like After all you'll still need to include in master Changelog for the |
|
For the temporary fix before we officially release v3.2 for st2 and st2chatops, installing hubot-stackstorm |
|
Just a note: hubot-stackstorm |
|
That's hopefully OK, considering that refactoring is non-breaking and didn't really introduce any changes. |
Pulling the fixes from #192 into the 0.9.7 branch.
This was manually tested separately from #192 with a minimal Mattermost installed on VM.