Skip to content

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 30, 2024

Coming soon: The Renovate bot (GitHub App) will be renamed to Mend. PRs from Renovate will soon appear from 'Mend'. Learn more here.

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
jsonwebtoken ^8.5.1 -> ^9.0.0 age confidence

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2022-23539

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library could be misconfigured so that legacy, insecure key types are used for signature verification. For example, DSA keys could be used with the RS256 algorithm.

Am I affected?

You are affected if you are using an algorithm and a key type other than the combinations mentioned below

Key type algorithm
ec ES256, ES384, ES512
rsa RS256, RS384, RS512, PS256, PS384, PS512
rsa-pss PS256, PS384, PS512

And for Elliptic Curve algorithms:

alg Curve
ES256 prime256v1
ES384 secp384r1
ES512 secp521r1

How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0. This version validates for asymmetric key type and algorithm combinations. Please refer to the above mentioned algorithm / key type combinations for the valid secure configuration. After updating to version 9.0.0, If you still intend to continue with signing or verifying tokens using invalid key type/algorithm value combinations, you’ll need to set the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and/or verify() functions.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you already use a valid secure combination of key type and algorithm. Otherwise, use the allowInvalidAsymmetricKeyTypes option to true in the sign() and verify() functions to continue usage of invalid key type/algorithm combination in 9.0.0 for legacy compatibility.

CVE-2022-23541

Overview

Versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library can be misconfigured so that passing a poorly implemented key retrieval function (referring to the secretOrPublicKey argument from the readme link) will result in incorrect verification of tokens. There is a possibility of using a different algorithm and key combination in verification than the one that was used to sign the tokens. Specifically, tokens signed with an asymmetric public key could be verified with a symmetric HS256 algorithm. This can lead to successful validation of forged tokens.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if your application is supporting usage of both symmetric key and asymmetric key in jwt.verify() implementation with the same key retrieval function.

How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0.

Will the fix impact my users?

There is no impact for end users

CVE-2022-23540

Overview

In versions <=8.5.1 of jsonwebtoken library, lack of algorithm definition and a falsy secret or key in the jwt.verify() function can lead to signature validation bypass due to defaulting to the none algorithm for signature verification.

Am I affected?

You will be affected if all the following are true in the jwt.verify() function:

  • a token with no signature is received
  • no algorithms are specified
  • a falsy (e.g. null, false, undefined) secret or key is passed

How do I fix it?

Update to version 9.0.0 which removes the default support for the none algorithm in the jwt.verify() method.

Will the fix impact my users?

There will be no impact, if you update to version 9.0.0 and you don’t need to allow for the none algorithm. If you need 'none' algorithm, you have to explicitly specify that in jwt.verify() options.


Release Notes

auth0/node-jsonwebtoken (jsonwebtoken)

v9.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes: See Migration from v8 to v9

Breaking changes
  • Removed support for Node versions 11 and below.
  • The verify() function no longer accepts unsigned tokens by default. ([8345030]8345030)
  • RSA key size must be 2048 bits or greater. ([ecdf6cc]ecdf6cc)
  • Key types must be valid for the signing / verification algorithm
Security fixes
  • security: fixes Arbitrary File Write via verify function - CVE-2022-23529
  • security: fixes Insecure default algorithm in jwt.verify() could lead to signature validation bypass - CVE-2022-23540
  • security: fixes Insecure implementation of key retrieval function could lead to Forgeable Public/Private Tokens from RSA to HMAC - CVE-2022-23541
  • security: fixes Unrestricted key type could lead to legacy keys usage - CVE-2022-23539

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 10 times, most recently from 0c02067 to aaf08e7 Compare December 6, 2024 12:47
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] Dec 6, 2024
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 7 times, most recently from 59feb59 to 0efa77a Compare December 20, 2024 16:52
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 8 times, most recently from 49f8611 to ca33af8 Compare December 27, 2024 17:50
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from d9fa228 to 4b10dec Compare January 4, 2025 02:07
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from a9c7254 to 48af00f Compare January 6, 2025 10:31
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from f674d37 to 829e64d Compare April 5, 2025 18:41
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from 45a757f to 0090785 Compare May 2, 2025 21:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 0090785 to d0b9eb3 Compare May 20, 2025 17:44
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from ee8d38e to 4efbe69 Compare May 30, 2025 21:07
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] May 31, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 38b1812 to a35d5ac Compare June 18, 2025 18:25
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [SECURITY] fix(deps): update dependency jsonwebtoken to v9 [security] Jun 18, 2025
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 9 times, most recently from 7aed480 to 4e57cb9 Compare June 28, 2025 18:27
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 4 times, most recently from d65c567 to abaedc1 Compare July 3, 2025 19:23
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch 2 times, most recently from 8b001c1 to f88c04c Compare August 25, 2025 18:02
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from f88c04c to 6b2e8bb Compare September 3, 2025 14:06
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/npm-jsonwebtoken-vulnerability branch from 6b2e8bb to 84f2c1f Compare September 6, 2025 18:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants