WIP: Swagger integration #2213
WIP: Swagger integration #2213
Conversation
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughSwagger/OpenAPI documentation has been integrated into the Express backend. The update adds the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant ExpressApp
participant SwaggerUI
User->>Browser: Navigates to /api-docs
Browser->>ExpressApp: GET /api-docs
ExpressApp->>SwaggerUI: Serve Swagger UI with OpenAPI spec (bundled.yaml)
SwaggerUI-->>Browser: Renders interactive API documentation
Browser-->>User: Displays Swagger UI for API exploration
Poem
Tip ⚡️ Faster reviews with caching
Enjoy the performance boost—your workflow just got faster. ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 31
🔭 Outside diff range comments (6)
docs/swagger.yaml (1)
1-16:⚠️ Potential issueAdd global security definitions to the OpenAPI specification.
The static analysis tool flagged a HIGH security issue (CKV_OPENAPI_4): The global security field is missing. This is important for defining default authentication requirements across all endpoints.
components: $ref: "./components.yaml#/components" +security: + - bearerAuth: []🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
[HIGH] 1-17: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
docs/routes/logs.yaml (1)
47-90: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionUnify response schema naming and add pagination support
The
GET /logs/{type}endpoint:
- Returns the logs array under
logs, unlike thedatafield inGET /logs.- Lacks pagination query parameters despite offering
next/prevlinks in the generic logs endpoint.Please:
- Standardize the array property (
logsvs.data) across all log endpoints.- Include
pageandsizequery parameters if pagination is supported.docs/routes/healthCheck.yaml (1)
27-59: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Clarify summary for versioned health check
The summary for
/healthcheck/v2is identical to the unauthenticated endpoint. Consider updating the summary to reflect the authenticated nature of this version, e.g.:summary: Returns the authenticated health status (v2) of the serverdocs/routes/pullrequests.yaml (1)
87-119:⚠️ Potential issueMissing path parameter definition
GET /pullrequests/user/{username}does not define theusernamepath parameter. You should include:parameters: - in: path name: username required: true schema: type: string description: GitHub usernameWithout this, the endpoint will not render correctly in Swagger UI.
docs/routes/auctions.yaml (1)
112-176: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect use of HTTP 204 with response body. The POST /auctions/bid/{id} endpoint also returns a body under a 204 status. Switch to 201 Created or eliminate the
contentsection beneath 204 to comply with the spec.docs/routes/auth.yaml (1)
231-270: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionMissing security for authorization status update. Protect the PATCH /auth/qr-code-auth/authorization_status/{authorization_status} route by adding:
security: - bearerAuth: []This ensures only authenticated users can change authorization status.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
app.js(2 hunks)bundled.yaml(1 hunks)docs/components.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/arts.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/auctions.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/auth.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/badges.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/challenges.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/contributions.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/healthCheck.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/index.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/logs.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/members.yaml(1 hunks)docs/routes/pullrequests.yaml(1 hunks)docs/swagger.yaml(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
docs/swagger.yaml
[HIGH] 1-17: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
bundled.yaml
[HIGH] 1-2045: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-2045: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
[MEDIUM] 25-50: Ensure that arrays have a maximum number of items
(CKV_OPENAPI_21)
🔇 Additional comments (9)
package.json (1)
45-47: Appropriate dependencies added for Swagger integration.The addition of
swagger-ui-expressandyamljspackages provides the necessary functionality to integrate and serve Swagger API documentation in the Express application. These dependencies are correctly placed in alphabetical order and use consistent versioning patterns.app.js (1)
24-24: Appropriate Swagger UI setup.The Swagger UI is correctly mounted at the "/api-docs" path with the explorer option enabled, providing an interactive interface for API documentation. The placement after application middlewares but before the 404 handler is appropriate.
docs/swagger.yaml (1)
11-15: Good modular structure for OpenAPI specification.The modular approach using $ref to reference paths and components from separate files is a good practice. This improves maintainability by keeping the specification organized and easier to update.
docs/routes/contributions.yaml (1)
1-32: Well-structured OpenAPI route definition.The endpoint is well-structured with appropriate tags, parameters, and response definitions. The use of references to common components for response schemas promotes reusability and consistency across the API documentation.
docs/routes/index.yaml (1)
1-66: API path index looks solidThe central routing index cleanly aggregates all modular route files with correct JSON Pointer escapes (
~1) and relative paths. This will simplify maintenance and clarity when adding new endpoints.docs/routes/healthCheck.yaml (1)
2-25: Looks good: unauthenticated health check
GET /healthcheckis properly documented without security and covers both200and500responses. The uptime schema is clear.docs/routes/arts.yaml (1)
1-179: API spec for Arts routes is well-structured. All endpoints include appropriate tags, path definitions, response codes, and references to shared components. No issues detected.bundled.yaml (2)
10-16: Review operation-level security consistency
Some endpoints (e.g.,GET /arts) have nosecuritydeclaration while others do. Please verify which routes should be public vs. protected and add or adjustsecurityblocks accordingly.
16-20: 🧹 Nitpick (assertive)Uniformly quote HTTP status codes
Response keys mix quoted and unquoted numeric codes (e.g.,200vs.'404'). For YAML consistency and to avoid potential parsing issues, quote all status codes:- 200: + '200':Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
| const app = express(); | ||
|
|
||
| // Swagger config | ||
| const swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling for YAML loading.
The current implementation doesn't handle potential errors when loading the YAML file, which could cause the application to crash during startup if the file is missing or malformed.
// Swagger config
-const swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml");
+let swaggerDocument;
+try {
+ swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml");
+} catch (error) {
+ console.error("Error loading Swagger document:", error.message);
+ swaggerDocument = { info: { title: "API Documentation Unavailable", version: "1.0.0" } };
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml"); | |
| // Swagger config | |
| let swaggerDocument; | |
| try { | |
| swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml"); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error("Error loading Swagger document:", error.message); | |
| swaggerDocument = { | |
| info: { | |
| title: "API Documentation Unavailable", | |
| version: "1.0.0" | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| } |
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Verify the path to the bundled.yaml file.
The Swagger document is loaded from "bundled.yaml" in the project root, but the OpenAPI specification files appear to be in the "docs/" directory. Ensure that:
- This file exists in the project root, or
- A build/bundling step creates this file, or
- The path should be updated to "docs/swagger.yaml" or similar
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if bundled.yaml exists in the project root
if [ -f "bundled.yaml" ]; then
echo "bundled.yaml exists in the project root"
else
echo "bundled.yaml does not exist in the project root"
echo "Checking for other YAML files that might be the intended target:"
find . -name "*.yaml" | grep -v "node_modules"
fiLength of output: 114
bundled.yaml path is valid; add error handling for YAML.load
- The file
bundled.yamldoes exist at the project root, so the import path is correct. - To avoid runtime crashes or obscure errors if the YAML fails to parse, wrap the load call in a try/catch and handle failures explicitly.
Suggested change in app.js (at around line 19):
- const swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml");
+ let swaggerDocument;
+ try {
+ swaggerDocument = YAML.load("bundled.yaml");
+ } catch (err) {
+ console.error("Failed to load Swagger document from bundled.yaml:", err);
+ // Exit or fallback as appropriate
+ process.exit(1);
+ }| info: | ||
| title: RDS Website Backend | ||
| version: 1.0.0 | ||
| description: Documentation for the RDS Website Backend APIs |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding more API metadata.
The current info section is minimal. Consider adding additional metadata such as contact information, license, terms of service, or external documentation links to make the API documentation more comprehensive.
info:
title: RDS Website Backend
version: 1.0.0
description: Documentation for the RDS Website Backend APIs
+ contact:
+ name: API Support
+ email: [email protected]
+ url: https://example.com/support
+ license:
+ name: MIT
+ url: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT| servers: | ||
| - url: "http://localhost:5000" | ||
| description: Local development server |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance server configuration for multiple environments.
Currently, only a local development server is defined. Consider adding server URLs for other environments like staging and production to make the documentation more complete and useful across different environments.
servers:
- url: "http://localhost:5000"
description: Local development server
+ - url: "https://api-staging.example.com"
+ description: Staging server
+ - url: "https://api.example.com"
+ description: Production server📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| servers: | |
| - url: "http://localhost:5000" | |
| description: Local development server | |
| servers: | |
| - url: "http://localhost:5000" | |
| description: Local development server | |
| - url: "https://api-staging.example.com" | |
| description: Staging server | |
| - url: "https://api.example.com" | |
| description: Production server |
| responses: | ||
| 200: | ||
| description: Return contributions | ||
| content: | ||
| application/json: | ||
| schema: | ||
| $ref: "../components.yaml#/components/schemas/Contributions" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding pagination parameters.
For endpoints returning potentially large collections of data, it's a good practice to include pagination parameters. This allows clients to control the amount of data returned and improves API performance.
parameters:
- in: path
name: username
schema:
type: string
required: true
description: username of user
+ - in: query
+ name: page
+ schema:
+ type: integer
+ default: 1
+ required: false
+ description: Page number for pagination
+ - in: query
+ name: limit
+ schema:
+ type: integer
+ default: 10
+ maximum: 100
+ required: false
+ description: Number of contributions per pageCommittable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| get: | ||
| summary: Used to get all the contributions of user | ||
| tags: | ||
| - Contributions |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance the endpoint documentation with more details.
The current summary is brief. Consider adding a more descriptive summary and a detailed description field to provide better context for API consumers. Also, consider specifying the security requirements for this endpoint.
get:
summary: Used to get all the contributions of user
+ description: Retrieves a comprehensive list of contributions made by the specified user, including details such as contribution type, timestamp, and associated projects.
tags:
- Contributions
+ security:
+ - bearerAuth: []📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| get: | |
| summary: Used to get all the contributions of user | |
| tags: | |
| - Contributions | |
| get: | |
| summary: Used to get all the contributions of user | |
| description: Retrieves a comprehensive list of contributions made by the specified user, including details such as contribution type, timestamp, and associated projects. | |
| tags: | |
| - Contributions | |
| security: | |
| - bearerAuth: [] |
| /members/intro/{username}: | ||
| post: | ||
| summary: Adds a recruiter to the recruiters collection | ||
| description: Adds a recruiter to the recruiters collection | ||
| tags: | ||
| - Members | ||
| parameters: | ||
| - in: path | ||
| name: username | ||
| required: true | ||
| schema: | ||
| type: string | ||
| description: The username of the recruiter to be added to the intro list | ||
| requestBody: | ||
| required: true | ||
| content: | ||
| application/json: | ||
| schema: | ||
| $ref: "../components.yaml#/components/schemas/Recruiter" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Verification agent
🧩 Analysis chain
Add security requirement to protect recruiter addition endpoint
The POST /members/intro/{username} operation is missing a security block. If this endpoint should be restricted to authenticated users, add:
security:
- bearerAuth: []to ensure only authorized clients can add recruiters.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing security blocks in the OpenAPI docs
rg -n "security:" -C3 docsLength of output: 6642
Add authentication to the recruiter-intro endpoint
The POST /members/intro/{username} operation in docs/routes/members.yaml is missing the standard security block. To align with the rest of your API (e.g., badges, members list, move/archival endpoints), insert the following under post: (around line 85), before parameters::
security:
- bearerAuth: []Example diff:
/members/intro/{username}:
post:
summary: Adds a recruiter to the recruiters collection
description: Adds a recruiter to the recruiters collection
tags:
- Members
+ security:
+ - bearerAuth: []
parameters:
- in: path
name: usernameThis ensures only authenticated clients can add recruiters.
| info: | ||
| title: RDS Website Backend | ||
| version: 1.0.0 | ||
| description: Documentation for the RDS Website Backend APIs | ||
| servers: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Enhance API metadata in the info section
Consider enriching your info block with termsOfService, contact, and license fields to provide clearer context and support details:
info:
title: RDS Website Backend
version: 1.0.0
+ termsOfService: https://example.com/terms/
+ contact:
+ name: API Support
+ url: https://example.com/support
+ email: [email protected]
+ license:
+ name: MIT
+ url: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT| type: string | ||
| desciption: message describing the status of the request | ||
| members: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typographical error in members schema
In the /members response, the message property uses desciption instead of description. Update it (and any similar instances) so Swagger will display the field description.
| arts: | ||
| type: array | ||
| items: | ||
| type: object | ||
| properties: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Consider adding array size constraints
Unbounded arrays in responses (e.g., the arts list) may mislead clients about expected payload sizes. You can document maxItems (and minItems) to bound the array:
properties:
arts:
type: array
items:
$ref: '#/components/schemas/Art'
maxItems: 1000| openapi: 3.0.0 | ||
| info: | ||
| title: RDS Website Backend | ||
| version: 1.0.0 | ||
| description: Documentation for the RDS Website Backend APIs | ||
| servers: | ||
| - url: 'http://localhost:5000' | ||
| description: Local development server |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick (assertive)
Define a global security requirement
To reduce repetition, you can add a top-level security field that applies bearerAuth by default to all operations. Public endpoints can then override with security: []. Example:
security:
- bearerAuth: []🧰 Tools
🪛 Checkov (3.2.334)
[HIGH] 1-2045: Ensure that the global security field has rules defined
(CKV_OPENAPI_4)
[HIGH] 1-2045: Ensure that security operations is not empty.
(CKV_OPENAPI_5)
Date: 16/10/2024
Developer Name: Abhishek
Issue Ticket Number
#2209
#866
Description
This PR is to integrate swagger with the website-backend repo. I'm implementing it through the yaml files and I'm segregating them via common components and schemas
Documentation Updated?
Under Feature Flag
Database Changes
Breaking Changes
Development Tested?
Screenshots
Test Coverage
Screenshot 1
Additional Notes