Skip to content

Conversation

@harkgill-amd
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Update project status for

  • torchcodec
  • torch-scatter
  • torch-sparse

as described in #2346

Technical Details

N/A

Test Plan

There already seems to be some hip/ROCm enablement in the upstream libraries (ex https://github.com/rusty1s/pytorch_scatter/blob/master/setup.py#L75-L79). Will try to build and test these but for the short term, updating the project support page to call out them out specifically.

Test Result

N/A

Submission Checklist

Copy link
Member

@ScottTodd ScottTodd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Comment on lines 32 to 33
> 1. Supported: Official packages are distributed by the ROCm team
> 2. Nightly: Included in TheRock-based packages, built nightly
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One extra distinction here is

package index domain description
https://download.pytorch.org/ official upstream releases with instructions at https://pytorch.org/get-started/locally/
https://repo.amd.com/rocm/ stable releases distributed by AMD and built by TheRock (technically built in https://github.com/ROCm/rockrel)
https://rocm.nightlies.amd.com/ nightly releases distributed by AMD and built by TheRock

I think in these docs we should focus on just what TheRock builds, though it is worth mentioning

  1. Which packages are compatible with what we distribute (torch-scatter, torch-sparse)
  2. Which packages are not yet compatible and are either on or off our roadmap to support (e.g. https://github.com/ROCm/apex)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added in the suggested sections. Let me know if this is what you were looking for.

@ScottTodd ScottTodd self-requested a review December 4, 2025 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: TODO

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants