Skip to content

Conversation

@bendichter
Copy link
Contributor

@bendichter bendichter commented Nov 3, 2025

EOL was Oct 31 2025

Checklist

  • Did you update CHANGELOG.md with your changes?
  • Have you checked our Contributing document?
  • Have you ensured the PR clearly describes the problem and the solution?
  • Is your contribution compliant with our coding style? This can be checked running ruff check . && codespell from the source directory.
  • Have you checked to ensure that there aren't other open Pull Requests for the same change?
  • Have you included the relevant issue number using "Fix #XXX" notation where XXX is the issue number? By including "Fix #XXX" you allow GitHub to close issue #XXX when the PR is merged.

EOL was Oct 31 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.85%. Comparing base (293af8c) to head (e777f26).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev    #2141      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   95.23%   94.85%   -0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          29       29              
  Lines        2876     2876              
  Branches      740      740              
==========================================
- Hits         2739     2728      -11     
- Misses         83       93      +10     
- Partials       54       55       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
integration 74.02% <ø> (-0.42%) ⬇️
unit 84.94% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bendichter bendichter requested a review from rly November 3, 2025 20:20
Copy link
Contributor

@stephprince stephprince left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One other suggestion otherwise looks good to me! I will let @rly add any comments and can then update the PR required checks to use the new minimum test workflow versions before merging.

@rly
Copy link
Contributor

rly commented Nov 5, 2025

Thanks for this PR @bendichter ! It looks all good to me. This should be in a minor release. We should also explore adding Python 3.14 support in a separate PR.

@rly
Copy link
Contributor

rly commented Nov 13, 2025

We'll make a bugfix release imminently and then do a minor release with this PR deprecating python 3.9 shortly after

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants