feat(xdp): add checksum verification on rx path

[RuiCunhaM]

This PR introduces checksum verification for IPv4 and UDP in the XDP rx path. It fixes #465

For UDP I utilized the available functions in xdp-util.h. As for IP, I followed the example from xdp-project, and I "borrowed" the functions from the Kernel (I don't think this causes any issues in terms of Licensing).

Furthermore, since this implies some extra computing per each packet/request, I wanted to measure the performance implications. With a server running on a machine with an Intel i5-9500 and an Intel 10G X550T NIC, at a rate of 1M packets/requests per second, the average CPU usage across all CPU cores went from 11.18% to 11.57%.

For a single client sending synchronous requests, its rate drops from an average of 12360 req/s to 12315 req/s.

If this minor performance hit is an issue, we could perhaps add a compile flag so checksum verification would become optional.

[mozzieongit]

Thanks for the PR.

(I don't think this causes any issues in terms of Licensing).

I'm not so sure about this statement. The file in the Linux kernel (lib/checksum.c) has the license GPL-2.0-or-later, we use the BSD-3-Clause for NSD. And roughly speaking, GPL is infectious, so we would have to use GPL as well when including GPL-licensed code in NSD. I'll ask, but to my knowledge, the do_csum function is sufficiently complex to be copyrightable and therefore we cannot simply copy that function without applying the GPL license. However, if the underlying algorithm is in the public domain or under a license compatible with NSD's license, then we could rewrite the function based on that algorithm.

If this minor performance hit is an issue, we could perhaps add a compile flag so checksum verification would become optional.

Thanks for benchmarking this. The performance hit seems negligible. If anyone using this in the future would like to have a compile option for the checksums, we can provide it, but I'd wait for when they ask for it. No need to add it now.

[RuiCunhaM]

I'm not so sure about this statement. The file in the Linux kernel (lib/checksum.c) has the license GPL-2.0-or-later, we use the BSD-3-Clause for NSD. And roughly speaking, GPL is infectious, so we would have to use GPL as well when including GPL-licensed code in NSD. I'll ask, but to my knowledge, the do_csum function is sufficiently complex to be copyrightable and therefore we cannot simply copy that function without applying the GPL license. However, if the underlying algorithm is in the public domain or under a license compatible with NSD's license, then we could rewrite the function based on that algorithm.

That's a great point. I, in fact, misjudged this, sorry. Let me know if there is something I can help with.