Skip to content

Conversation

sanskar122
Copy link

@sanskar122 sanskar122 commented Sep 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Git commands reference to include an enhanced commit message example.
    • Added an additional example line following the git status usage.
    • General cleanup and wording adjustments for clarity.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 16, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated git_commands.txt: revised a commit message string and inserted an extra line after a git status command.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Command list text
git_commands.txt
- Changed commit message text to "added testing files jai hind"
- Inserted a new line "niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegit status" after a git status line

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

I thump my paws at lines that spin,
A status here, a message grin.
“Jai hind,” I nibble, ears held high—
A quirky command hops passing by.
In docs I burrow, neat and tight,
One fluffy tweak, then off in flight. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ❓ Inconclusive The PR title "Dev" is overly generic and does not summarize the primary change; the changeset edits git_commands.txt by changing a commit message (from "added testing files" to "added testing files jai hind") and inserting an extra status-like line ("niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegit status"), which the title does not reflect. Because the title provides no meaningful context for reviewers or history, the check cannot conclusively determine that it describes the changes. Rename the PR to a concise, descriptive title that reflects the main change (for example: "Update git_commands.txt: change commit message and add status line" or "Fix commit message and add diagnostic git status line in git_commands.txt") and then re-run the pre-merge checks.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

👮 Agentic pre-merge checks are now available in preview!

Pro plan users can now enable pre-merge checks in their settings to enforce checklists before merging PRs.

  • Built-in checks – Quickly apply ready-made checks to enforce title conventions, require pull request descriptions that follow templates, validate linked issues for compliance, and more.
  • Custom agentic checks – Define your own rules using CodeRabbit’s advanced agentic capabilities to enforce organization-specific policies and workflows. For example, you can instruct CodeRabbit’s agent to verify that API documentation is updated whenever API schema files are modified in a PR. Note: Upto 5 custom checks are currently allowed during the preview period. Pricing for this feature will be announced in a few weeks.

Please see the documentation for more information.

Example:

reviews:
  pre_merge_checks:
    custom_checks:
      - name: "Undocumented Breaking Changes"
        mode: "warning"
        instructions: |
          Pass/fail criteria: All breaking changes to public APIs, CLI flags, environment variables, configuration keys, database schemas, or HTTP/GraphQL endpoints must be documented in the "Breaking Change" section of the PR description and in CHANGELOG.md. Exclude purely internal or private changes (e.g., code not exported from package entry points or explicitly marked as internal).

Please share your feedback with us on this Discord post.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
git_commands.txt (2)

7-7: Use a clear, conventional commit message.

Avoid non-descriptive phrases in commit messages. Prefer an imperative, scoped message for clarity.

Apply this diff:

-git commit -m "added testing files jai hind"
+git commit -m "test: add testing files"

18-19: Fix/Remove accidental command typo.

niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegit status is not a valid command and will fail if copy‑pasted.

Apply one of the following diffs:

Option A — just remove the noise:

-niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegit status
-

Option B — keep intent and run status:

-niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeegit status
+git status
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 707e5c6 and 6fd9362.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • git_commands.txt (2 hunks)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant