added new #11
added new #11
Conversation
WalkthroughThe updates involve modifying Changes
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
added new |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
demo.py (1)
2-4: Docstring does not follow PEP 257; add a descriptive summary and “Returns” sectionThe multiline docstring is currently just “this is demo”. Provide a one-line summary plus optional details and a
Returnssection to improve readability and linting scores.- """ - this is demo - """ + """ + Return a friendly greeting. + + Returns + ------- + str + Greeting message. + """
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
demo.py(1 hunks)testing.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- testing.py
|
|
||
|
|
||
| my_function() | ||
| hello() |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Top-level call executes on import and its return value is discarded
Calling hello() at module import time can cause side effects when the module is imported elsewhere and the result is silently ignored.
Wrap the invocation in a __main__ guard and explicitly use the returned string (e.g. print it).
-hello()
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+ print(hello())📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| hello() | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| print(hello()) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In demo.py at line 8, the call to hello() is executed at import time and its
return value is discarded, which can cause unintended side effects. To fix this,
wrap the call to hello() inside an if __name__ == "__main__": block and
explicitly handle the return value, for example by printing it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
demo.py (1)
6-6: Top-level call still executed on import – comment already provided earlierThe unconditional
hello()invocation remains, leading to side-effects on import. See the prior review for the recommendedif __name__ == "__main__":guard.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
demo.py(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
demo.py
3-3: SyntaxError: unindent does not match any outer indentation level
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
demo.py
[error] 3-3: Parsing failed: 'unindent does not match any outer indentation level (demo, line 3)'
(E0001)
demo.py
Outdated
| """Return a demo greeting message.""" # ← Proper function docstring | ||
| return "hello dosto" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Indentation mismatch causes a hard SyntaxError – the module cannot be imported
The docstring is indented with 5 spaces whereas the enclosing def block uses 4. This triggers the SyntaxError: unindent does not match any outer indentation level reported by both Ruff and Pylint, and the file fails to load.
-def hello():
- """Return a demo greeting message.""" # ← Proper function docstring
- return "hello dosto"
+# Function-level indentation must be consistent (4 spaces)
+def hello():
+ """Return a demo greeting message."""
+ return "hello dosto"
+
+
+# Only execute when run directly, not on import
+if __name__ == "__main__":
+ print(hello())📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| """Return a demo greeting message.""" # ← Proper function docstring | |
| return "hello dosto" | |
| # Function-level indentation must be consistent (4 spaces) | |
| def hello(): | |
| """Return a demo greeting message.""" | |
| return "hello dosto" | |
| # Only execute when run directly, not on import | |
| if __name__ == "__main__": | |
| print(hello()) |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.11.9)
3-3: SyntaxError: unindent does not match any outer indentation level
🪛 Pylint (3.3.7)
[error] 3-3: Parsing failed: 'unindent does not match any outer indentation level (demo, line 3)'
(E0001)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In demo.py around lines 2 to 3, the function docstring is indented with 5 spaces
while the enclosing def block uses 4 spaces, causing a SyntaxError. Fix this by
adjusting the docstring indentation to match the def block's 4 spaces exactly,
ensuring consistent indentation throughout the function.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
demo.py (1)
9-9: Avoid executing code at import time – wraphello()in a__main__guardCalling
hello()at the top level means the function runs (and its return value is discarded) whenever any module importsdemo. This breaks the “no-side-effects on import” rule and was already flagged in a previous review.-hello() +if __name__ == "__main__": + # Explicitly use the returned value + print(hello())
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
demo.py (1)
4-6: Consider adding type hints for clarityPEP-484 style annotations improve readability and help static analysis:
-def hello(): - """Return a demo greeting message.""" - return "hello dosto" +def hello() -> str: + """Return a demo greeting message.""" + return "hello dosto"
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
demo.py (1)
7-7: Top-level call still executes on import – wrap with__main__guard
Same issue flagged in the previous review remains: executinghello()at import time introduces side-effects and discards the result. Guard the call and handle the return value explicitly.-hello() +if __name__ == "__main__": + print(hello())
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
demo.py (1)
3-5: Add simple type hints for clarity
Since this is demo code, adding return-type annotation keeps examples crisp and helps static analysis:-def hello(): +def hello() -> str:
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
demo.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
demo.py (1)
1-5: Looks good – indentation and basic structure fixed
Indentation mismatch reported earlier is resolved and the module/function docstrings are in place.
Summary by CodeRabbit