Skip to content

Conversation

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor

@war-in war-in commented Jul 25, 2025

Explanation of Change

We introduced this patch during the migration to React Native 0.79 to fix this issue.
The issue occurred because React Native 0.79 changed the line height algorithm, so we decided to restore the old algorithm (the one from RN 0.77) to fix the issue asap.

It turns out that the bug is on our side and after removing the patch and height style prop from affected components (e.g. AmountForm) the issue is not reproducible.

Fixed Issues

$ #65284
$ #67144 - previous deploy blocker
PROPOSAL:

Tests

  1. Open the Expensify app
  2. Tap on the FAB
  3. Tap on "Create Expense"
  4. Enter any amount
  5. Note that amount and currency are displayed on the same line
  6. Change font size
  7. Rerun steps 2-6

Offline tests

QA Steps

  1. Open the Expensify app
  2. Tap on the FAB
  3. Tap on "Create Expense"
  4. Enter any amount
  5. Note that amount and currency are displayed on the same line
  6. Change font size
  7. Rerun steps 2-6

PR Author Checklist

  • I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
    • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
    • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
    • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
    • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
    • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
    • Android: Native
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: Native
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
      • If any non-english text was added/modified, I used JaimeGPT to get English > Spanish translation. I then posted it in #expensify-open-source and it was approved by an internal Expensify engineer. Link to Slack message:
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native
Screen.Recording.Jul.28.2025.from.Marcin.Warchol.mp4
Android: mWeb Chrome
iOS: Native
iOS: mWeb Safari
MacOS: Chrome / Safari
MacOS: Desktop

@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 25, 2025

Hey! I see that you made changes to our Form component. Make sure to update the docs in FORMS.md accordingly. Cheers!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

⚠️ This PR is possibly changing native code and/or updating libraries, it may cause problems with HybridApp. Please check if any patch updates are required in the HybridApp repo and run an AdHoc build to verify that HybridApp will not break. Ask Contributor Plus for help if you are not sure how to handle this. ⚠️

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions

This comment has been minimized.

@war-in war-in marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2025 09:18
@war-in war-in requested review from a team as code owners July 28, 2025 09:18
@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested review from shubham1206agra and removed request for a team July 28, 2025 09:18
@melvin-bot
Copy link

melvin-bot bot commented Jul 28, 2025

@shubham1206agra Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67176.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌ ❌ FAILED ❌
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/67176/NewExpensify.dmg https://67176.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

Asked QA for a retest of the blocker

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor Author

war-in commented Jul 28, 2025

I think I need to merge main, will do that soon

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor Author

war-in commented Jul 28, 2025

@mountiny could you retrigger the build? 🙏

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1206agra the previous blocker is not reproducible

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67176.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/67176/index.html ❌ FAILED ❌
Android The QR code can't be generated, because the iOS build failed
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/67176/NewExpensify.dmg https://67176.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

shubham1206agra commented Jul 28, 2025

Screenshot 2025-07-28 at 8 15 40 PM

@war-in Currency looks misaligned here. Also, currency box is smaller than prod.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67176.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/67176/index.html https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/67176/index.html
Android iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/67176/NewExpensify.dmg https://67176.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor Author

war-in commented Jul 31, 2025

@shubham1206agra The issue is fixed! But, it seems like the latest adhoc didn't refresh or upload properly? 🤔
I can still reproduce the issue you reported on the adhoc build, but it works fine locally

Screen.Recording.Jul.31.2025.from.Marcin.Warchol.mp4

Any ideas what's going on here? cc @mountiny
We encountered this issue earlier today on some web adhoc build

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Aug 4, 2025

that should should happen only on web with cdn cache

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor Author

war-in commented Aug 4, 2025

Hmm, so I'm not sure why the bug is still there 🤔
I merged main, can I get an adhoc build here? 🙏

cc @mountiny

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

I will review this PR today

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67176.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
❌ FAILED ❌ https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/ios/67176/index.html
The QR code can't be generated, because the Android build failed iOS
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/67176/NewExpensify.dmg https://67176.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

🚧 @mountiny has triggered a test Expensify/App build. You can view the workflow run here.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 4, 2025

🧪🧪 Use the links below to test this adhoc build on Android, iOS, Desktop, and Web. Happy testing! 🧪🧪
Built from App PR #67176.

Android 🤖 iOS 🍎
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/android/67176/index.html ⏩ SKIPPED ⏩
Android The build for iOS was skipped
Desktop 💻 Web 🕸️
https://ad-hoc-expensify-cash.s3.amazonaws.com/desktop/67176/NewExpensify.dmg https://67176.pr-testing.expensify.com
Desktop Web

👀 View the workflow run that generated this build 👀

@war-in
Copy link
Contributor Author

war-in commented Aug 4, 2025

Ok, the latest build went well and the issue is fixed 🎉
Aug 4 Screenshot from Marcin Warchoł

@mountiny
Copy link
Contributor

mountiny commented Aug 4, 2025

@shubham1206agra All yours please

@shubham1206agra
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewer Checklist

  • I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
  • I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
  • I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
    • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
    • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
    • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
    • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
  • I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
  • I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
  • I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
    • Android: HybridApp
    • Android: mWeb Chrome
    • iOS: HybridApp
    • iOS: mWeb Safari
    • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
    • MacOS: Desktop
  • If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
  • I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
  • I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
    • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
    • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
    • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
    • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
    • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
    • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
    • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
    • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
  • If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
  • I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
  • I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
  • I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
  • I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
  • If a new component is created I verified that:
    • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
    • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
    • The file is named correctly
    • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
    • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
    • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
    • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
    • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
    • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
  • If any new file was added I verified that:
    • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
  • xIf a new CSS style is added I verified that:
    • A similar style doesn't already exist
    • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
  • If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
  • If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
  • If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
  • If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
  • If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
    • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
    • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
  • If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
  • For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
  • If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
  • I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp Screenshot 2025-07-23 at 7 05 33 PM
Android: mWeb Chrome Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 10 56 14 PM
iOS: HybridApp Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 11 16 21 PM
iOS: mWeb Safari Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 10 30 22 PM Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 10 32 54 PM
MacOS: Chrome / Safari Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 10 27 56 PM
MacOS: Desktop Screenshot 2025-08-04 at 11 01 37 PM

@melvin-bot melvin-bot bot requested a review from mountiny August 4, 2025 18:08
@mountiny mountiny changed the title "Delete restore-old-line-height-algorithm React Native patch" v2 Delete restore-old-line-height-algorithm React Native patch v2 Aug 4, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@mountiny mountiny left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you

@mountiny mountiny merged commit 7ba5fc8 into Expensify:main Aug 4, 2025
28 checks passed
@OSBotify
Copy link
Contributor

OSBotify commented Aug 4, 2025

✋ This PR was not deployed to staging yet because QA is ongoing. It will be automatically deployed to staging after the next production release.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 6, 2025

🚀 Deployed to staging by https://github.com/mountiny in version: 9.1.90-0 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 8, 2025

🚀 Deployed to production by https://github.com/jasperhuangg in version: 9.1.90-11 🚀

platform result
🖥 desktop 🖥 success ✅
🕸 web 🕸 success ✅
🤖 android 🤖 success ✅
🍎 iOS 🍎 success ✅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants