-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 128
libLLVM.a doesn't exist, so fix how enzyme is linking LLVM #2302
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ZuseZ4
wants to merge
5
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
fix-llvm-enzyme-linkage2
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm fairly certain this was intentionally removed due to a bug in LLVM's packaging of the dylib
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you work around it, since linking failed on the Julia side without this line.
Also, any other requests before landing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(I am also OK with having another switch, so julia can keep it's old code path.)
Rust can deal with upstream LLVM if the zlib packaging comes back to cause us issues, in case that its' still the case. I feel like Julia should probably still move over since I think it currently only works by coincidence, see my first point above, but I don't want to debug julia precompilation since I already have enough cmake and bootstrap challenges.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let's do these things one at a time to confirm they're fine.
Can you leave this as a non-functional change (aka keep old zlib behavior) first, but add the non dylib linking, and then a follow up for zlib change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem is that I only added the zlib change, because Julia CI was failing (locally it worked fine without the patch). See https://github.com/EnzymeAD/Enzyme/actions/runs/14826186325/job/41619569312
For some reason it doesn't seem to pick up the /usr zlib library?