Skip to content

Conversation

@wouteraddink
Copy link
Contributor

updated for new terms.dissco.tech url and advancement with sandbox support of openDS v0.3.

@wouteraddink wouteraddink self-assigned this Dec 5, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@samleeflang samleeflang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

small remark

README.md Outdated
You can become involved and contribute by making comments through Github issues. For this, we created two simple [Github templates](https://github.com/DiSSCo/openDS/issues/new/choose): one for feedback on a term and another for general comments. When commenting on a term please include the term name, for example, dwc:highestBiostratigraphicZone. Note that most terms are coming from existing standards but a few are openDS specific. We aim to apply controlled vocabularies for terms where appropriate to increase data quality and interoperability. These are not yet part of the documentation.

DiSSCo is supported by different EU grants. A dedicated development team and other collaborators working towards a robust specification. The implementations can be seen in our current [Sandbox](https://sandbox.dissco.tech/). Note that the openDS data model v0.3 has not yet been implemented in our sandbox annotations portal (sandbox.dissco.tech), which still uses version v0.2. However, some JSON examples of v0.3 can be found through our development API, for example, https://dev.dissco.tech/api/v1/digital-specimen.
DiSSCo is supported by different EU grants. A dedicated development team and other collaborators are working towards a robust openDS specification. The implementation (under construction) can be tried out in our [Sandbox](https://sandbox.dissco.tech/). A JSON example of v0.3 in progress can be found through our development API, for example, https://dev.dissco.tech/api/v1/digital-specimen.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are at v0.4.0 already. We skipped v0.3 in sandbox

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, updated it

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! This link https://dev.dissco.tech/api/v1/digital-specimen doesn't work (07/02/25)... wanting to poke around to see what support there is for rocks and minerals especially. Can you point me to an updated version please?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, we'll upate the readme but this is the current endpoint: https://dev.dissco.tech/api/digital-specimen/v1

@wouteraddink wouteraddink requested a review from southeo January 23, 2025 10:31
Copy link
Contributor

@southeo southeo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🥇

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants