Skip to content

Conversation

@tylfin
Copy link
Member

@tylfin tylfin commented Oct 15, 2025

Motivation

Enable the test now that latest Python tracer supports the APM_MULTICONFIG RC capability.

Changes

  • Removes the @missing_feature decorator from the test_inproduct_enablement_exception_replay_apm_multiconfig test.

Workflow

  1. ⚠️ Create your PR as draft ⚠️
  2. Work on you PR until the CI passes
  3. Mark it as ready for review
    • Test logic is modified? -> Get a review from RFC owner.
    • Framework is modified, or non obvious usage of it -> get a review from R&P team

🚀 Once your PR is reviewed and the CI green, you can merge it!

🛟 #apm-shared-testing 🛟

Reviewer checklist

  • If PR title starts with [<language>], double-check that only <language> is impacted by the change
  • No system-tests internal is modified. Otherwise, I have the approval from R&P team
  • A docker base image is modified?
    • the relevant build-XXX-image label is present
  • A scenario is added (or removed)?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

CODEOWNERS have been resolved as:

tests/debugger/test_debugger_inproduct_enablement.py                    @DataDog/debugger @DataDog/system-tests-core

@tylfin
Copy link
Member Author

tylfin commented Oct 15, 2025

@P403n1x87 Could you investigate? This passes when you just run the apm test, e.g.:

./run.sh DEBUGGER_INPRODUCT_ENABLEMENT ./tests/debugger/test_debugger_inproduct_enablement.py::Test_Debugger_InProduct_Enablement_Exception_Replay::test_inproduct_enablement_exception_replay_apm_multiconfig

but fails against the whole class:

./run.sh DEBUGGER_INPRODUCT_ENABLEMENT ./tests/debugger/test_debugger_inproduct_enablement.py::Test_Debugger_InProduct_Enablement_Exception_Replay

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants