Skip to content

Conversation

AdyenAutomationBot
Copy link
Collaborator

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot commented Aug 11, 2025

OpenAPI spec files or templates have been modified on 03-10-2025 by commit.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 11, 2025 13:56
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch from e247482 to bdee263 Compare August 11, 2025 13:56
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request contains automatically generated code updates for the Adyen Management APIs and Balance Control API. The changes primarily involve refactoring the underlying API client logic for improved error handling and request sending, along with minor stylistic formatting adjustments and documentation updates across various service and model files.

Highlights

  • API Client Refactoring: The core logic for sending API requests and handling HTTP responses has been centralized within the common.SendAPIRequest function. This eliminates redundant error handling and JSON unmarshalling code from individual API service files, leading to cleaner and more maintainable code.
  • Code Formatting & Readability: Various Go files have received minor stylistic updates, including changes to import statement formatting, multiline curly braces for return statements, and single-line array declarations for enum values. These changes improve overall code consistency and readability.
  • Documentation Updates: Minor textual adjustments and formatting improvements have been applied to inline comments and API documentation strings across several service files, enhancing clarity for developers.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request appears to be from an automated code generation process, introducing mostly formatting changes and updates to services and models. However, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed. Several files have had necessary imports like encoding/json and io/ioutil removed, which will cause compilation errors. Additionally, io/ioutil is deprecated and should be replaced with io. There is also significant code duplication in error handling across many of the API methods, which should be refactored. Finally, there are some minor formatting inconsistencies that should be addressed in the code generator.

@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 9 times, most recently from 12bd805 to 3d75fe1 Compare August 18, 2025 16:53
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 5 times, most recently from 5a0bd89 to 72cad91 Compare August 25, 2025 11:09
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 3 times, most recently from 0fbe6d2 to 2b622d0 Compare August 29, 2025 16:29
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 9 times, most recently from 2ba5f9c to caaae11 Compare September 16, 2025 22:10
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 12 times, most recently from 4f7f0c2 to a0103f4 Compare September 25, 2025 09:30
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch 7 times, most recently from 100e224 to 8148ca6 Compare October 1, 2025 12:38
@AdyenAutomationBot AdyenAutomationBot force-pushed the sdk-automation/ManagementAPIs branch from 44a1532 to 1292203 Compare October 3, 2025 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant