Skip to content

[Experiment] Nanobind #127

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: development
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[Experiment] Nanobind #127

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ax3l
Copy link
Member

@ax3l ax3l commented May 4, 2023 •
edited
Loading

What would it take to migrate to nanobind?

Pro's

See advertising, all great :)

Love the

  • speed & size
  • separate headers for features
  • non-header-only approach
  • C++17 and newer only
  • faster builds: no LTO needed anymore

Notes / Con's

  • limited official compiler support (Clang, GCC, MSVC), especially no coverage yet for GPU (Nvidia NVCC & NVHPC, AMD ROCm, Intel OneAPI)
  • still many warnings (e.g., Wshadow, Wpedantic) in base lib
  • currently, limited public docs improved :)

@ax3l
[Experiment] Nanobind
f72cd06 
What would it take to migrate to nanobind?
@ax3l ax3l mentioned this pull request Aug 31, 2023
Closed
@ax3l ax3l force-pushed the development branch 8 times, most recently from 352e4dd to 424c52f Compare November 30, 2023 22:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@ax3l