-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
Prepare SDK beta release 0.4.0-beta.1 #159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add logic for handling invoking requests directly through the 1Password Desktop app, for leveraging the desktop app prompt authentication model for desktop integrations built on top of the SDK.
…ons (#155) This PR brings the following beta features to the SDK: - Vault - `List` - supports fetching only the vault overview instead of fully decrypted vaults - `GetOverview` - `Get` - Vault permission management for groups: - `GrantGroupPermissions` - `UpdateGroupPermissions` - `RevokeGroupPermissions` - Bulk operations on items: - `CreateAll` - `GetAll` - `DeleteAll` - Groups - get a list of groups --------- Co-authored-by: 1PasswordSDKBot <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eddy Filip <[email protected]>
This PR does two changes: - Make the paths to the SDK IPC client on Linux and MacOS more accurate - Remove support for Windows. This will not be out yet during beta.
Currently, they're not working as expected to be part of a beta release. They will be brought back once they're in a working state.
aryaemami59
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
aryaemami59
reviewed
Oct 28, 2025
AndyTitu
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2025
hculea
reviewed
Oct 29, 2025
| if (authConfig.accountName) { | ||
| core.setInner(new SharedLibCore(authConfig.accountName)); | ||
| } | ||
| const clientId = await core.initClient(authConfig); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
non blocker, just curious - why is the client ID needed here, since the authorization is going to be scoped on the process level and not the client level?
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This beta release contains the following features:
List- supports fetching only the vault overview instead of fully decrypted vaultsGetOverviewGetCreateAllGetAllDeleteAll