Unable to document type statements

[bigtimebuddy]

These error keep popping up for me when I built the docs.

[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/basis/src/Basis.ts<118, 0>}
[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/basis/src/Basis.ts<135, 0>}
[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/basis/src/Basis.ts<145, 0>}
[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/compressed-textures/src/loaders/CompressedTextureLoader.ts<6, 0>}
[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/compressed-textures/src/loaders/CompressedTextureLoader.ts<18, 0>}
[DocParser]: Failed to parse doc for (@Unnamed){@packages/compressed-textures/src/resources/CompressedTextureResource.ts<7, 0>}

All these instances are all trying to document type. Here's an example.

/**
 * API provided by basis_universal WebGL library.
 *
 * @ignore
 */
export type BasisBinding = {
    BasisFile: typeof BasisFile,
    initializeBasis(): void
};

Changing this to the following made it go away:

/**
 * API provided by basis_universal WebGL library.
 *
 * @typedef {object} BasisBinding
 * @ignore
 */
export type BasisBinding = {
    BasisFile: typeof BasisFile,
    initializeBasis(): void
};

[ShukantPal]

Ah, yes. webdoc doesn't recognize type definitions from the code. If you don't give it the @typedef tag, it fails to resolve the documentation to any type.

I'll be adding support for this sometime soon. Do you think we should also add type support to pixi-webdoc-template?

[ShukantPal]

Or should type BasisBinding become a typedef by inference?

[bigtimebuddy]

Yeah, I think this should be a typedef by inference. It weird that there's an error though because these statement have @ignore, why is that?

[ShukantPal]

@bigtimebuddy The parser still parses the whole document even if @ignore is specified. @ignore marked documents are pruned after the fact:

webdoc/packages/webdoc-parser/src/transformer/mod-prune.js

Line 7 in 921a640

if (doc.tags && doc.tags.find((tag) => tag.name === "ignore")) {

I agree this is a weakness of the architecture.

[ShukantPal]

Inference improvements