I've posted a comprehensive technical analysis comparing TEP-524 and TEP-525 in the #524 discussion thread. The comparison examines both proposals across 9 key technical dimensions.

[adamlaska]

I've posted a comprehensive technical analysis comparing TEP-524 and TEP-525 in the #524 discussion thread. The comparison examines both proposals across 9 key technical dimensions.

Please review the analysis here: #524 (comment)

Looking forward to community feedback on the technical merits of both approaches.

Originally posted by @ipromise2324 in #525 (comment)

[Rastakhcarbon]

Hi Thank you for sharing your detailed analysis regarding TEP-524 and TEP-525. I’ve carefully reviewed the points you raised in the “Fourteen Points” breakdown, and here’s my take: **Summary & Key Observations:** - TEP-524 demonstrates stronger alignment with existing DeFi standards, offering a standardized API for tokenized Vaults that simplifies cross-protocol interactions. - The proposal addresses issues such as inconsistent function calls, heterogeneous query interfaces, and varied event formats, which are common in current implementations. - TEP-525, while an alternative, seems less comprehensive in its approach and may face integration challenges, particularly in terms of API consistency and protocol interoperability. - Overall, TEP-524 appears more practical for immediate adoption within the TON ecosystem, providing both clarity and robustness for developers. **Suggestions / Next Steps:** - Explore areas where TEP-525’s unique ideas could complement TEP-524 rather than replace it entirely. - Conduct further discussions on potential integration scenarios and testing strategies to validate implementation feasibility. - Encourage community feedback to refine the proposals and ensure alignment with real-world use cases. Looking forward to your thoughts and any additional insights you might have. Best regards, [Rastakh] در تاریخ سه‌شنبه ۲۱ اکتبر ۲۰۲۵، ۲۲:۰۹ JohnnyGoGoGo ***@***.***> نوشت:

…

Closed #537 <#537> as not planned. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#537 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BVDOIS666RBEJ7LMBFY4WQL3YZ4XRAVCNFSM6AAAAACJZ6SBR6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV45UABCJFZXG5LFIV3GK3TUJZXXI2LGNFRWC5DJN5XDWMRQGQYTENBRGY3TSNY> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>