-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
Migrate to new rand_core utility functions
#78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Value reproducibility is broken only in We could either tolerate the value breakage and potentially reduced performance, or we should modify the utility functions to restore the old behavior. |
|
Our reproducibility rules allow value-breaking changes in new minor versions. Further, I checked the biggest reverse-dependencies of |
|
There are a bunch of stylistic changes here. Since I'm not 100% sure on the helper-function approach yet (and to make this cleaner), would you mind separating out the style/quality improvements ( |
The biggest question is whether we want ~2x slower performance for
I would prefer to keep the minor refactoring changes as part of this PR for now. If you decide against the new helper functions, I could create a separate PR later. |
This sounds like a big issue...
But this is just I'm considering some changes to |
Depends on rust-random/rand_core#24