Replies: 1 comment 6 replies
-
You may find interesting the existing discussion on potentially implementing a task queue/scheduler that is kept open in issue #3. The short answer is that I have not got round to it yet. Recent development has gone into areas higher on my own priority list which has been the performance/stability of nanonext 0.6.0 (to be imminently released). In principle I am open to integrations of nanonext with other frameworks, especially if other maintainers see a need and reach out. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
6 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Clustermq is my go-to library for HPC computing in R, given its use of zeromq and schedulers like slurm. Where are nanonext and mirai headed next? Is there a natural way to extend mirai with schedulers or plug nanonext into clustermq as another method? I understand nng has some advantages over zeromq.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions