Search results

Best number of <code>total_tokens</code> on the default <code>CapacityLimiter</code>

performance

Status: Open.

#2364 In python-trio/trio;

· Kludex opened on Jul 1, 2022

Consider setting TCP_QUICKACK instead of TCP_NODELAY when possible

low-level

performance

Status: Open.

#1792 In python-trio/trio;

· ghost opened on Nov 6, 2020

Skip schedule points if we've done one recently enough

performance

todo soon

Status: Open.

#1757 In python-trio/trio;

· oremanj opened on Oct 12, 2020

Slower performance compared to curio

performance

Status: Open.

#1595 In python-trio/trio;

· rthalley opened on Jun 9, 2020

Tune default receive buffer size

performance

Status: Open.

#1139 In python-trio/trio;

· njsmith opened on Jul 4, 2019

notes on profiling Trio programs

docs

performance

Status: Open.

#943 In python-trio/trio;

· belm0 opened on Feb 21, 2019

trio.timeit utility

performance

Status: Open.

#677 In python-trio/trio;

· belm0 opened on Sep 22, 2018

use a heap instead of sorteddict?

performance

Status: Open.

#385 In python-trio/trio;

· lilydjwg opened on Dec 21, 2017

Do some benchmarking to choose a sensible default number of threads

performance

Status: Open.

#230 In python-trio/trio;

· njsmith opened on Jun 18, 2017

TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT umbrella issue

design discussion

performance

polish

Status: Open.

#76 In python-trio/trio;

· njsmith opened on Mar 10, 2017

Should our locks (and semaphores, queues, etc.) be fair?

design discussion

performance

potential API breaker

Status: Open.

#54 In python-trio/trio;

· njsmith opened on Feb 14, 2017

Design: alternative scheduling models

design discussion

performance

Status: Open.

#32 In python-trio/trio;

· njsmith opened on Jan 23, 2017