diff --git a/chapters/functions.tex b/chapters/functions.tex
index a557cfe06..7fbc5dd78 100644
--- a/chapters/functions.tex
+++ b/chapters/functions.tex
@@ -1644,7 +1644,7 @@ \subsection{Using the Inverse Annotation}\label{using-the-inverse-annotation}
   annotation(experiment(StopTime = 10.0));
 end NotSurjective;
 \end{lstlisting}
-As the value of {\lstinline!x!} varies over the interval $[-1,\, 1]$, but the range of {\lstinline!cbrtPos!} is only $(0, \infty)$, the informal codomain of {\lstinline!cbrtPos!} cannot be restricted such that the surjectiveness is fulfilled.
+As the value of {\lstinline!x!} varies over the interval $[-0.5,\, 1.5]$, but the range of {\lstinline!cbrtPos!} is only $(0, \infty)$, the informal codomain of {\lstinline!cbrtPos!} cannot be restricted such that the surjectiveness is fulfilled.
 A valid solution to the equation in {\lstinline!x!} and {\lstinline!y!} must satisfy $\text{{\lstinline!y!}} > 0$, and when no {\lstinline!inverse!} annotation is given, a violation will be detected by a nonlinear solver applied directly to the equation.
 When the (invalid) inverse provided by the {\lstinline!inverse!} annotation is used, however, the equation gets transformed into
 \begin{lstlisting}[language=modelica]