Add type hints to improve codebase readability and enable static type checking

[Niraj-Kamdar]

I propose adding type hints to the mocket Python package to enhance code readability and maintainability. Type hints provide several benefits, including improved developer productivity, enhanced code documentation, and the ability to catch potential errors using static type-checking tools like Mypy.

[mindflayer]

Hi @Niraj-Kamdar, I am not sure if I got your proposal right. Are you volunteering to add type hints to the project?

[mindflayer]

No answers to my question, closing it.

[Niraj-Kamdar]

Hey @mindflayer Sorry for the late reply here. My proposal is for adding type hints in general, I would love to help here though when I get free time but currently, I have too much on my plate to help out with this. I would appreciate if you can keep this issue open so others or me can eventually take this and add type-hints to the mocket.

[Kilo59]

@mindflayer Closing this issue signals that

1. You don't plan to add type annotations.
2. You aren't willing to accept contributions that add these.

Can you re-open this issue if one or both of these are untrue?

[mindflayer]

@mindflayer Closing this issue signals that

1. You don't plan to add type annotations.

2. You aren't willing to accept contributions that add these.

Can you re-open this issue if one or both of these are untrue?

I am the only maintainer of Mocket, and I think it's worth keeping non-bug issues open only if I am confident it's something I have time for, or at least if I know someone is willing to help with.
Having a backlog of stuff just for the sake of it it's pointless.
So, allow me to bounce back the question: is anyone willing to contribute with adding type hints?

[Kilo59]

So, allow me to bounce back the question: is anyone willing to contribute with adding type hints?

@mindflayer

Yes. The only thing that gives me pause about taking on this work is the fact that this issue was closed. Which makes it ambiguous as to whether an annotation PR would be accepted.

[mindflayer]

Well, alright then! 👍

[mindflayer]

Hi @Kilo59, are you still planning to continue with this task?

[betaboon]

Hello @mindflayer,

i just ran into the same "issue" wanting to have this library typed.

I started taking a stab at it, but noticed huge parts of the core are hard to type especially due to how request- and response-types are handled (eg Entry.response_cls)

i think typing this library fully requires some heavy-handed refactoring in some areas.

I'd be willing to do the work (ensuring to not touch the tests), but I'm wondering if you are open to a PR that does said refactoring in addition to the typing?

kind regards
beta

[mindflayer]

Hi @betaboon, I am not against things like that, and I see many reasons for wanting type hints added to Mocket, especially for people using it as a framework for writing new mocks.
It's definitely not the main use-case, but I believe the reason for it is a mix of poor documentation and lack of type hints.

[betaboon]

Hi @betaboon, I am not against things like that, and I see many reasons for wanting type hints added to Mocket, especially for people using it as a framework for writing new mocks. It's definitely not the main use-case, but I believe the reason for it is a mix of poor documentation and lack of type hints.

cool. I'll start working on a PR and push an early commit showing the direction of refactoring i have in mind, so that you can take a look and think whether you like that direction or not :)