Add Claude Code GitHub Workflow

[himaratsu]

🤖 Installing Claude Code GitHub App

This PR adds a GitHub Actions workflow that enables Claude Code integration in our repository.

What is Claude Code?

Claude Code is an AI coding agent that can help with:

• Bug fixes and improvements
• Documentation updates
• Implementing new features
• Code reviews and suggestions
• Writing tests
• And more!

How it works

Once this PR is merged, we'll be able to interact with Claude by mentioning @claude in a pull request or issue comment.
Once the workflow is triggered, Claude will analyze the comment and surrounding context, and execute on the request in a GitHub action.

Important Notes

• This workflow won't take effect until this PR is merged
• @claude mentions won't work until after the merge is complete
• The workflow runs automatically whenever Claude is mentioned in PR or issue comments
• Claude gets access to the entire PR or issue context including files, diffs, and previous comments

Security

• Our Anthropic API key is securely stored as a GitHub Actions secret
• Only users with write access to the repository can trigger the workflow
• All Claude runs are stored in the GitHub Actions run history
• Claude's default tools are limited to reading/writing files and interacting with our repo by creating comments, branches, and commits.
• We can add more allowed tools by adding them to the workflow file like:

allowed_tools: Bash(npm install),Bash(npm run build),Bash(npm run lint),Bash(npm run test)

There's more information in the Claude Code action repo.

After merging this PR, let's try mentioning @claude in a comment on any PR to get started!

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
nextjs-simple-blog-template	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Aug 6, 2025 2:24am

[claude]

Claude finished @himaratsu's task —— View job

---

PR Review: Claude Code GitHub Workflow

I've reviewed both workflow files and here's my comprehensive feedback:

Todo List:

• Read and analyze workflow files
• Check code quality and best practices
• Identify potential bugs or issues
• Review security considerations
• Assess performance implications
• Check for test coverage (if applicable)
• Provide comprehensive feedback

---

🟢 Overall Assessment: Excellent Implementation

Both workflow files are well-structured and follow GitHub Actions best practices. This is a solid implementation of Claude Code integration.

📋 Detailed Review

Code Quality & Best Practices ✅

Strengths:

• Clean YAML syntax with proper indentation and formatting
• Comprehensive comments explaining optional configurations
• Logical separation of concerns between automated reviews (claude-code-review.yml) and interactive usage (claude.yml)
• Proper use of GitHub Actions conditional expressions
• Good documentation through inline comments

.github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:78: Excellent use of examples showing different configuration options for various use cases

.github/workflows/claude.yml:15-19: Well-implemented conditional logic handling multiple trigger scenarios

Security Considerations ✅

Secure practices identified:

• API key properly stored as GitHub secret (${{ secrets.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }})
• Minimal required permissions granted (contents: read, pull-requests: read, etc.)
• Uses official Anthropic action (anthropics/claude-code-action@beta)
• Proper permission scoping with id-token: write for authentication

Recommendations:

• Consider pinning the action to a specific commit hash instead of @beta for enhanced security: anthropics/claude-code-action@<commit-hash>
• The commented allowed_tools examples show good security awareness by being restrictive

Performance Considerations ✅

Optimizations present:

• fetch-depth: 1 limits git history fetch for faster checkout
• Conditional execution prevents unnecessary runs
• Efficient trigger filtering in claude.yml:15-19

Minor considerations:

• Both workflows use ubuntu-latest which is appropriate
• No unnecessary dependencies or complex setup steps

Potential Issues & Improvements 🟡

Minor observations:

1. .github/workflows/claude-code-review.yml:36: Using @beta tag - consider if stability is preferred over latest features
2. Commented code: While helpful for documentation, consider if all commented examples are necessary or could be moved to separate documentation
3. Missing workflow timeout: Consider adding timeout-minutes to prevent runaway jobs

Configuration Flexibility ✅

Excellent configurability:

• Multiple trigger options (PR events, issue comments, reviews)
• Customizable prompts for different scenarios
• Optional sticky comments feature
• Flexible author-based filtering
• Comprehensive tool allowlist examples

Test Coverage 🔶

N/A for workflow files, but the implementation includes:

• Examples of how to enable testing tools via allowed_tools
• Good coverage of different GitHub event types
• Conditional logic properly handles edge cases

🎯 Recommendations

1. Pin action versions for better security:

   uses: anthropics/claude-code-action@<specific-commit-hash>

2. Add workflow timeouts:

   jobs:
     claude-review:
       timeout-minutes: 10

3. Consider adding workflow dispatch for manual testing:

   on:
     workflow_dispatch:

✨ Standout Features

• Comprehensive documentation through comments
• Flexible trigger system accommodating various use cases
• Security-first approach with minimal permissions
• Performance-optimized with shallow git fetch
• Excellent examples for customization

This is a high-quality implementation that follows GitHub Actions best practices and provides a solid foundation for Claude Code integration in the repository.

---