Skip to content

Conversation

@fhpessin
Copy link

@fhpessin fhpessin commented Nov 5, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great job implementing the core logic! The two-pass approach works well, and you've successfully created and linked the Person instances. However, this submission requires changes because it doesn't follow several key guidelines from the project checklist, which are important requirements for this task. Please address the following points:

  • Use List Comprehension: The initial creation of Person objects should be done with a list comprehension instead of a for loop, as required by [CHECKLIST ITEM #3].
  • Improve Conditional Logic: The checks for spouses use if "key" in data and nested if statements. Please refactor this to use the dict.get() method and combine conditions into a single if statement. This addresses [CHECKLIST ITEM #2] and [CHECKLIST ITEM #4].

Making these changes will bring your code in line with the project's standards. I'm looking forward to your next submission!


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Important

Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.

Tip

If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.

Caution

Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

  2. Re-request AI review example

  3. Add AI review comments example

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 17 to 21
for data in people_data:
name = str(data["name"])
age = int(data["age"])
person = Person(name, age)
persons.append(person)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This violates checklist item #3: 'When creating a list of instances from a collection (such as a list of dictionaries), it is recommended to use list comprehension rather than traditional for loops.' This entire block can be replaced with a more concise list comprehension.

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 28 to 31
if "wife" in data and data["wife"] is not None:
wife_name = str(data["wife"])
if wife_name in Person.people:
person.wife = Person.people[wife_name]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This block violates two checklist items. It violates checklist #4 by checking for a key with "wife" in data instead of using the recommended data.get('wife'). It also violates checklist #2 by using a nested if statement on line 30. These conditions can be combined into a single if statement using and for a cleaner approach.

app/main.py Outdated
Comment on lines 34 to 37
if "husband" in data and data["husband"] is not None:
husband_name = str(data["husband"])
if husband_name in Person.people:
person.husband = Person.people[husband_name]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the check for a wife, this block violates checklist item #4 by not using dict.get() and checklist item #2 by using a nested if (on line 36). Please refactor this to use .get() and combine the conditions into a single if statement.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Excellent work on this revision! I am approving your solution as you've successfully addressed all the previous feedback and met all the project requirements. The logic is clear, and your use of list comprehension and dict.get() is implemented perfectly.

The automated checks have flagged a minor linting issue in app/main.py on line 13, where a docstring is slightly too long. You can easily fix this by shortening the text to be under 79 characters. This is just a style note and doesn't affect the approval. Well done!


✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

Footnotes

  1. Rate AI review example

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants