Skip to content

Add mesh conformance tests for httproute port and scheme redirect #3776

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?
/area conformance-test

Add mesh tests for port and scheme redirect
This is a follow up to #3729

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add mesh tests coverage

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Related #3581

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Add mesh conformance tests for httproute port and scheme redirect 

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. labels Apr 30, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 30, 2025
@LiorLieberman LiorLieberman force-pushed the httproute-redirect-mesh-tests branch from 2c64c87 to a88271b Compare May 1, 2025 02:15
@LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@LiorLieberman
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @kflynn

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from kflynn May 2, 2025 18:19
Copy link
Member

@robscott robscott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @LiorLieberman!

MeshConformanceTests = append(MeshConformanceTests, MeshHTTPRouteRedirectPort)
}

var MeshHTTPRouteRedirectPort = suite.ConformanceTest{
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think I missed this from the earlier conversations, but what's the plan to make these tests more sustainable + maintainable? Would it be viable to just have a simple script that did the copying and modification required for any tests that should be replicated for mesh? Is there a way to share the same test definitions for both?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LiorLieberman, robscott

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/conformance-test Issues or PRs related to Conformance tests. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants