Licensing information is mostly missing #42
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Copied verbatim from https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt so please adjust it with the actual values. Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello!
I've found that the project barely has any licensing information so I've spent a few moments to clarify it. Turned out that the original work is licensed under 2-clause BSD license as stated in 0xYUANTI/stdlib2@efd90fb (cherry-picked to this PR) while the rest modern contribution made by @kivra team is licensed under Apache License 2.0 (I guess?).
You don't have an issue tracker so I had to create a PR for this mater. Could you please add licensing info to the repo either by merging this PR or by any other way suitable for you? Please note that I've added a Apache License 2.0 template without filling legal placeholders so if you decide to merge this then you have to adjust the text of the license.