You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When you first reference the relationship between the observed and estimated covariance matrix Line 369, it is as $\Sigma = \Sigma(\Phi)$ where $\Sigma$ is the observed variance-covariance matrix and $\Sigma(\Phi)$ is the model-estimated version.
but a few lines later in the maximum-likelihood fitting function (Line 381) and beyond, you use $\Sigma$ (but $\hat{\Sigma}$ in the equation) as the modeled covariance matrix and $S$ as the observed covariance matrix.
I also noticed a few typos, but now see that they are addressed by #2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When you first reference the relationship between the observed and estimated covariance matrix Line 369, it is as$\Sigma = \Sigma(\Phi)$ where $\Sigma$ is the observed variance-covariance matrix and $\Sigma(\Phi)$ is the model-estimated version.
but a few lines later in the maximum-likelihood fitting function (Line 381) and beyond, you use$\Sigma$ (but $\hat{\Sigma}$ in the equation) as the modeled covariance matrix and $S$ as the observed covariance matrix.
I also noticed a few typos, but now see that they are addressed by #2.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: