Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

The answer is probably that this exact API has been unchanged since at least 0.5 which predates convert::TryInto/TryFrom by a lot. That's required to make the array type actually usable. As for PR, yes, I do agree it would be better and would gladly take a PR. That said, but it's a major breaking change and going to go into the next major version.

Replies: 1 comment 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@LikeLakers2
Comment options

Answer selected by LikeLakers2
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants