WASM and "unsafe" languages #1415
DerpMcDerp
started this conversation in
Suggestions
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There have been 2 trends over the past few years:
If you're targeting WASM, then "safe" languages just adds overhead on top of the overhead of the sandbox. So C++ can counter the "safe" language propaganda by promoting WASM as a target and saying C++'s value add is that it doesn't add additional overhead on top of the sandbox's overhead.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions